Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Volume 11; 2014 > Article
Brief Report
 Students’ perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba: a follow-up study
P. Ravi Shankar1*orcid, Rishi Bharti2orcid, Ravi Ramireddy3orcid, Ramanan Balasubramanium4orcid, Vivek Nuguri4orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.9
Published online: May 7, 2014

1Departments of Pharmacology, Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands

2Departments of Epidemiology, Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands

3Departments of Biochemistry, Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands

4Departments of Pathology, Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands

*Corresponding email: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com

: 

• Received: February 27, 2014   • Accepted: May 6, 2014

© 2014, National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board of the Republic of Korea

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 30,578 Views
  • 179 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Xavier University School of Medicine admits students mainly from the United States and Canada to the undergraduate medical program. A previous study conducted in June 2013 used the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure to measure the educational environment and impact of different teaching and learning methods in the program. The present study aims to obtain information about students' perceptions of changes in the educational environment, which underwent modifications in teaching and learning, in January 2014. Information was collected about the participants' semester of study, gender, nationality, and age. Students' perceptions of the educational environment were documented by noting their degree of agreement with a set of 50 statements grouped into five categories. Average scores were compared among different groups. The mean total and category scores were compared to those of the 2013 study. Sixty of the sixty-nine students (86.9%) who enrolled in the undergraduate medical program participated in the survey. The majority were male, aged 20-25 years, and of American nationality. The mean±SD total score was 151.32±18.3. The mean scores for students' perception in the survey categories were perception of teaching/learning (38.45), perception of teachers (33.90), academic self-perceptions (22.95), perception of atmosphere (36.32), and social self-perception (19.70). There were no significant differences in these scores among the different groups. All scores except those for academic self-perception were significantly higher in the present study compared to the previous one (P<0.05). The above results will be of particular interest to schools that plan to transition to an integrated curriculum.
  • Keywords: Educational measurement; Follow-up study; Medical education; Medical student; Perception
The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) has been widely used to evaluate the educational environment in medical schools [1, 2]. Xavier University School of Medicine is a private medical school in Aruba that admits students mainly from the United States of America and Canada to the undergraduate medical (MD) course. Students take the first five semesters of the course in Aruba and then complete their clinical rotations in the United States of America. A number of modifications to the MD program have been carried out since January 2013 [2, 3]. The basic science subjects were partially integrated according to organ systems with normal human structure and function (Anatomy, Physiology, and Biochemistry) and are now covered in the first two semesters; structure and function in disease (Pathology, Microbiology, Pharmacology, and Introduction to Clinical Medicine) are covered in the third and fourth semesters. Problem-based learning (PBL) sessions and sessions on the critical appraisal of scientific literature (CASL) were introduced in May 2013. An online module on patient safety and health management provided by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (http://www.ihi.org/) has also been offered as of September 2013. Further, the assessment system was modified to include formative assessment and assessment of attitudes and behavior. From the January 2014 semester, all basic science subjects (Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Pathology, Pharmacology, Microbiology, and Epidemiology) are taught in a fully integrated organ system–based manner, and family health visits have been introduced. Given students’ difficulty in coping with the tight course schedule, an additional semester of study was introduced to allow them more study and preparation time. The institution’s educational environment was previously studied using DREEM in June 2013. The present study was conducted to obtain further information about students’ perceptions of the recent changes, including the curriculum integration, changes to student assessment, and introduction of activity-based, small group learning sessions.
Students’ DREEM scores were compared among different groups of respondents as well as against those obtained in a previous study [2]. The study was carried out among first- to fourth-semester MD students during the last week of January 2014 using a validated instrument, DREEM [1]. The aims and objectives of the study were explained to the students, and their written informed consent was obtained. A semester of study consists of 15 weeks. Students are admitted three times a year—in January, May, and September. Information was collected about the participating students’ semester of study, gender, nationality, and age. Their perceptions of the institution’s educational environment were documented by noting their degree of agreement with a set of 50 statements using a modified Likert-type scale. The statements were grouped into five categories: perception of teaching/learning; perception of teachers, academic self-perception, perception of atmosphere, and social self-perception. Certain statements were negative, and their scores were reversed in the calculation of the category scores. The total score was obtained by adding together the scores of all the categories. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 20 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The scores of individual statements were noted. The average scores were compared among different groups of respondents using appropriate statistical tests (P < 0.05). The mean total score and category scores were also compared to those obtained in the previous study [2].The present third- and fourth-semester MD students were in their first and second semester, respectively, at the time of the previous survey. Their scores in the previous and present study were compared using a paired t-test. Sixty of the 69 students (86.9%) in the undergraduate medical program participated in the study. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the student respondents. The majority of respondents (66.7%) were male, aged 20 to 25 years, and of American nationality. The mean±SD total score was 151.32±18.3. The mean±SD scores for perception of teaching/learning and perception of teachers were 38.45±4.40 and 33.90±4.77, respectively. The mean±SD scores for academic self-perception, perception of atmosphere, and social self-perception were 22.95±5.07, 36.32±5.53, and 19.70±3.57, respectively.
Table 2 shows the category and total scores according to the gender of the respondents. There was no significant difference in the scores according to gender. Table 3 shows the category scores and total scores according to the respondents’ semester of study. There were no significant differences in the scores of students of different semesters. Table 4 shows the category scores and total scores of students by nationality. Among the scores of individual statements, the scores of the following statements (i.e., those with scores of less than 2.5) were areas of concern: I seldom feel lonely (2.35), I am rarely bored in this course (2.28), There is a good support system for students who feel stressed (2.23), The school uses a good timetable (2.00), The enjoyment outweighs the stress of studying medicine (2.30), and The teaching overemphasizes factual learning (reversed score; 2.00). All scores except those for the category of academic self-perception were significantly higher in the present study compared to the 2013 investigation [2]. The mean score for perception of teaching/learning was 38.45 in the present study, whereas it was 31.97 (p < 0.001) in the previous one. The mean score for perception of teachers was 33.90, compared to 30.05 (p < 0.001) in June 2013. Then, the mean score for perception of atmosphere increased from 30.92 in June 2013 to 36.32 in January 2014 (p < 0.001), while the mean score for social self-perception increased from 16.96 to 19.70 (p < 0.001) and the mean total score increased from 131.79 in to 151.32 (p < 0.001). The mean scores of the present third-semester students were compared to the same scores reported in the previous study when the students were in their first semester (Table 5). The scores for perception of teaching/learning and perception of teachers, and the total score, were significantly higher compared to those reported previously. The mean scores of the present fourth-semester students were compared to those obtained previously (Table 6). The score for perception of teaching/learning and the total score were significantly higher.
In the free comments section, the students wrote as follows: “The sporadic changes in the timetable are confusing and at times frustrating,” “Group studying after school hours seems to be discouraged because classrooms are not allowed to be used by separate groups,” “Students need to conduct themselves properly outside of school,” “Studying at school is impossible, and study carousels are needed,” “I think we need to have relaxation time after integrated quizzes and exams, because we are often sleep deprived,” and “There needs to be better communication between teachers and students as well as among teachers.” Each of these statements was only mentioned by a single student.
There was a significant improvement in all category scores and in the total score when the results of this study were compared to those of the previous one. Other previous studies have compared DREEM scores in schools over a period of time. For example, a school in Saudi Arabia saw a significant improvement in scores in 2010/2011 compared to 2007/2008 [4]. In a medical school in the United Arab Emirates, mean total scores were significantly higher for second-year students who participated in an integrated curriculum than for second-year students who had learned under a discipline-based curriculum the previous year [5]. Kuwait University Medical School underwent a curricular transition from a traditional to a problem-based curriculum in 2006/2007. Following the transition, students’ academic self-perception deteriorated while their perception of the atmosphere improved [6]. The authors postulate that this may be because conventional learning strategies were perceived as being no longer useful. In our study, there was no significant change in academic self-perception. The amount of PBL has increased, but lectures continue to be the predominant learning method at Xavier University School of Medicine. In addition, there was an improvement in certain areas of concern noted during the previous study. Among these were “The teaching is too teacher centered,” “I am too tired to enjoy this course,” “The teachers ridicule the students,” “The teachers are authoritarian,” and “The atmosphere is relaxed during the teaching.” We are working towards creating areas in the school where students can learn together in groups. With the increased emphasis on small group learning during PBL sessions and other activities, the students seem to have discovered the benefits of working in a group where group work and cooperative learning are encouraged. We are also working towards streamlining the timetable and have fortnightly meetings to finalize the integrated timetable for the next two weeks; however, sometimes faculties request changes even after the timetable is finalized, which creates confusion. As the course of study is accelerated and completed over a 15-week period, it is difficult to provide free time to the students both before and after the exam.
In conclusion, there were significant improvements in the category scores and the overall score compared to the results from June 2013. The results of this investigation will be of particular interest to schools that are in the process of transitioning to an integrated curriculum or those that have recently transitioned, as the issues and challenges they face may be similar to those mentioned in this study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

The authors thank all the students who participated in the study.
Audio recording of the abstract.
jeehp-11-09-abstract-recording.avi
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic No. (%)
Gender Male 40 (66.7)
Female 20 (33.3)
Semester First 14 (23.3)
Second 14 (23.3)
Third 14 (23.3)
Fourth 18 (30.0)
Age (years) Less than 20 5 (8.3)
20 to 25 47 (78.3)
More than 25 8 (13.3)
Nationality American 34 (56.7)
Canadian 13 (21.7)
Other 13 (21.7)
Table 2.
Category scores and total scores according to the gender of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic Gender Mean score P-value
Perception of teaching/learning Male 37.75 0.081
Female 39.85
Perception of teachers Male 33.20 0.108
Female 35.30
Academic self-perception Male 22.45 0.284
Female 23.95
Perception of atmosphere Male 36.10 0.672
Female 36.75
Social self-perception Male 19.63 0.820
Female 19.85
Total Male 149.13 0.192
Female 155.70
Table 3.
Category scores and total scores according to the respondents' semester of study in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic Semester Mean score P-value
Perception of teaching/learning First 39.86 0.528
Second 38.64
Third 37.71
Fourth 37.78
Perception of teachers First 34.71 0.443
Second 34.79
Third 34.14
Fourth 32.39
Academic self-perception First 24.50 0.568
Second 21.86
Third 23.00
Fourth 22.56
Perception of atmosphere First 36.79 0.797
Second 37.36
Third 35.64
Fourth 35.67
Social self-perception First 21.14 0.330
Second 19.79
Third 18.86
Fourth 19.17
Total First 157.00 0.519
Second 152.43
Third 149.36
Fourth 147.56
Table 4.
Category scores and total score according to the nationality of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic Nationality Mean score P-value
Perception of teaching/learning American 38.40 0.863
Canadian 38.10
Other 39.00
Perception of teachers American 33.47 0.713
Canadian 34.23
Other 34.69
Academic self-perception American 22.35 0.588
Canadian 23.77
Other 23.69
Perception of atmosphere American 36.38 0.531
Canadian 35.00
Other 37.46
Social self-perception American 19.76 0.800
Canadian 19.15
Other 20.08
Total American 150.35 0.731
Canadian 150.23
Other 154.92
Table 5.
Total scores for third-semester students in January 2014 and June 2013 (when they were first-semester students) in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic Mean score (June 2013) Mean score (January 2014) P-value
Perception of teaching/learning 33.00 38.00 0.023
Perception of teachers 29.77 34.38 0.012
Academic self-perception 20.61 23.23 0.240
Perception of atmosphere 31.85 35.54 0.225
Social self-perception 16.92 18.69 0.286
Total 132.15 149.85 0.037
Table 6.
Total scores for fourth-semester students in January 2014 and June 2013 (when they were second-semester students) in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure
Characteristic Mean score (June 2013) Mean score (January 2014) P-value
Perception of teaching/learning 31.71 36.86 0.006
Perception of teachers 30.50 32.00 0.420
Academic self-perception 20.64 22.00 0.552
Perception of atmosphere 27.00 35.00 0.053
Social self-perception 16.07 19.14 0.209
Total 125.93 145.00 0.048

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Characterization of the learning environment of an Internal Medicine course for medical students of ICESI University of Cali, Colombia
      Janer Varón Arenas, Henry Arley Taquez Quenguan, Nathalia Salazar Falla, Diana Salazar Ulloa
      Educación Médica.2021; 22: 486.     CrossRef
    • Understanding the Mentoring Environment Through Thematic Analysis of the Learning Environment in Medical Education: a Systematic Review
      Jia Min Hee, Hong Wei Yap, Zheng Xuan Ong, Simone Qian Min Quek, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
      Journal of General Internal Medicine.2019; 34(10): 2190.     CrossRef
    • Developing and validating a tool for measuring the educational environment in clinical anesthesia
      Navdeep S. Sidhu, Eleri Clissold
      Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.2018; 65(11): 1228.     CrossRef
    • Challenges in shifting to an integrated curriculum in a Caribbean medical school
      P. Ravi Shankar
      Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 9.     CrossRef
    • Initiating small group learning in a Caribbean medical school
      P. Ravi Shankar
      Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 10.     CrossRef
    • Reassessing the educational environment among undergraduate students in a chiropractic training institution: A study over time
      Per J. Palmgren, Tobias Sundberg, Klara Bolander Laksov
      Journal of Chiropractic Education.2015; 29(2): 110.     CrossRef
    • Student feedback about the integrated curriculum in a Caribbean medical school
      P. Ravi Shankar, Ramanan Balasubramanium, Neelam R. Dwivedi, Vivek Nuguri
      Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2014; 11: 23.     CrossRef
    • Designing and conducting a two day orientation program for first semester undergraduate medical students
      P. Ravi Shankar
      Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2014; 11: 31.     CrossRef

    Students’ perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba: a follow-up study
    Students’ perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba: a follow-up study
    Characteristic No. (%)
    Gender Male 40 (66.7)
    Female 20 (33.3)
    Semester First 14 (23.3)
    Second 14 (23.3)
    Third 14 (23.3)
    Fourth 18 (30.0)
    Age (years) Less than 20 5 (8.3)
    20 to 25 47 (78.3)
    More than 25 8 (13.3)
    Nationality American 34 (56.7)
    Canadian 13 (21.7)
    Other 13 (21.7)
    Characteristic Gender Mean score P-value
    Perception of teaching/learning Male 37.75 0.081
    Female 39.85
    Perception of teachers Male 33.20 0.108
    Female 35.30
    Academic self-perception Male 22.45 0.284
    Female 23.95
    Perception of atmosphere Male 36.10 0.672
    Female 36.75
    Social self-perception Male 19.63 0.820
    Female 19.85
    Total Male 149.13 0.192
    Female 155.70
    Characteristic Semester Mean score P-value
    Perception of teaching/learning First 39.86 0.528
    Second 38.64
    Third 37.71
    Fourth 37.78
    Perception of teachers First 34.71 0.443
    Second 34.79
    Third 34.14
    Fourth 32.39
    Academic self-perception First 24.50 0.568
    Second 21.86
    Third 23.00
    Fourth 22.56
    Perception of atmosphere First 36.79 0.797
    Second 37.36
    Third 35.64
    Fourth 35.67
    Social self-perception First 21.14 0.330
    Second 19.79
    Third 18.86
    Fourth 19.17
    Total First 157.00 0.519
    Second 152.43
    Third 149.36
    Fourth 147.56
    Characteristic Nationality Mean score P-value
    Perception of teaching/learning American 38.40 0.863
    Canadian 38.10
    Other 39.00
    Perception of teachers American 33.47 0.713
    Canadian 34.23
    Other 34.69
    Academic self-perception American 22.35 0.588
    Canadian 23.77
    Other 23.69
    Perception of atmosphere American 36.38 0.531
    Canadian 35.00
    Other 37.46
    Social self-perception American 19.76 0.800
    Canadian 19.15
    Other 20.08
    Total American 150.35 0.731
    Canadian 150.23
    Other 154.92
    Characteristic Mean score (June 2013) Mean score (January 2014) P-value
    Perception of teaching/learning 33.00 38.00 0.023
    Perception of teachers 29.77 34.38 0.012
    Academic self-perception 20.61 23.23 0.240
    Perception of atmosphere 31.85 35.54 0.225
    Social self-perception 16.92 18.69 0.286
    Total 132.15 149.85 0.037
    Characteristic Mean score (June 2013) Mean score (January 2014) P-value
    Perception of teaching/learning 31.71 36.86 0.006
    Perception of teachers 30.50 32.00 0.420
    Academic self-perception 20.64 22.00 0.552
    Perception of atmosphere 27.00 35.00 0.053
    Social self-perception 16.07 19.14 0.209
    Total 125.93 145.00 0.048
    Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 2. Category scores and total scores according to the gender of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 3. Category scores and total scores according to the respondents' semester of study in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 4. Category scores and total score according to the nationality of the respondents in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 5. Total scores for third-semester students in January 2014 and June 2013 (when they were first-semester students) in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 6. Total scores for fourth-semester students in January 2014 and June 2013 (when they were second-semester students) in the survey of students' perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Table 4.

    Table 5.

    Table 6.

    JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
    © Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute.
    TOP