Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Brief Report

Proposal for a Modified Dreyfus and Miller Model with simplified competency level descriptions for performing self-rated surveys: Janghee Park; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12:54. Published online November 30, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.54

36,680 View
334 Download
10 Web of Science
11 Crossref

In competency-based education, it is important to frequently evaluate the degree of competency achieved by establishing and specifying competency levels. To self-appraise one’s own competency level, one needs a simple, clear, and accurate description for each competency level. This study aimed at developing competency stages that can be used in surveys and conceptualizing clear and precise competency level descriptions. In this paper, the author intends to conceptualize a simple competency level description through a literature review. The author modified the most widely quoted competency level models—Dreyfus’ Five-stage Model and Miller’s Pyramid—and classified competency levels into the following: The Modified Dreyfus Model comprises absolute beginner, beginner, advanced beginner, competent, proficient, and expert, while the Modified Miller Model uses the levels of knows little, knows and knows how, exercised does, selected does, experienced does, and intuitive does. The author also provided a simple and clear description of competency levels. The precise description of competency levels developed in this study is expected to be useful in determining one’s competency level in surveys.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Long-Term Retention of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Knowledge and Confidence in Doctor of Pharmacy Students
Susan E. Smith, Andrea N. Sikora, Michael Fulford, Kelly C. Rogers
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.2024; 88(1): 100609. CrossRef
Impact of fully guided implant planning software training on the knowledge acquisition and satisfaction of dental undergraduate students
Shishir Ram Shetty, Colin Alexander Murray, Sausan Al Kawas, Sara Jaser, Natheer Al-Rawi, Wael Talaat, Sangeetha Narasimhan, Sunaina Shetty, Pooja Adtani, Shruthi Hegde
Medical Education Online.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment of a support garment in parastomal bulging from a patient perspective: a qualitative study
Trine Borglit, Marianne Krogsgaard, Stine Zeberg Theisen, Mette Juel Rothmann
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Milestones 2.0: An advancement in competency-based assessment for dermatology
Kiran Motaparthi, Laura Edgar, William D. Aughenbaugh, Anna L. Bruckner, Alexa Leone, Erin F. Mathes, Andrea Murina, Ronald P. Rapini, David Rubenstein, Ashley Wysong, Erik J. Stratman
Clinics in Dermatology.2022; 40(6): 776. CrossRef
Sandbox of Competence: A Conceptual Model for Assessing Professional Competence
Alcides Luiz Neto, Luciano Ferreira da Silva, Renato Penha
Administrative Sciences.2022; 12(4): 182. CrossRef
Preparation for Challenging Cases: What Differentiates Expert From Novice Surgeons?
Iman Ghaderi, Lev Korovin, Timothy M. Farrell
Journal of Surgical Education.2021; 78(2): 450. CrossRef
Rethinking Competence: A Nexus of Educational Models in the Context of Lifelong Learning
Dalia Bajis, Betty Chaar, Rebekah Moles
Pharmacy.2020; 8(2): 81. CrossRef
Meeting Personal Health Care Needs in Primary Care: A Response From the Athletic Training Profession
Wade Green, Eric Sauers
Athletic Training Education Journal.2020; 15(4): 278. CrossRef
Dreyfus scale-based feedback increased medical students’ satisfaction with the complex cluster part of a interviewing and physical examination course and improved skills readiness in Taiwan
Shiau-Shian Huang, Chia-Chang Huang, Ying-Ying Yang, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Boaz Shulruf, Chen-Huan Chen
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 30. CrossRef
Fitness for purpose in anaesthesiology: a review
Nicola Kalafatis, Thomas Sommerville, Pragasan Dean Gopalan
Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia.2018; 24(6): 148. CrossRef
Confidence in Procedural Skills before and after a Two-Year Master’s Programme in Family Medicine in Gezira State, Sudan
K. G. Mohamed, S. Hunskaar, S. H. Abdelrahman, E. M. Malik
Advances in Medicine.2017; 2017: 1. CrossRef

Research Article

Validation of a clinical critical thinking skills test in nursing: Sujin Shin, Dukyoo Jung, Sungeun Kim; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12:1. Published online January 27, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.1

35,269 View
287 Download
5 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to develop a revised version of the clinical critical thinking skills test (CCTS) and to subsequently validate its performance. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of the CCTS. Data were obtained from a convenience sample of 284 college students in June 2011. Thirty items were analyzed using item response theory and test reliability was assessed. Test-retest reliability was measured using the results of 20 nursing college and graduate school students in July 2013. The content validity of the revised items was analyzed by calculating the degree of agreement between instrument developer intention in item development and the judgments of six experts. To analyze response process validity, qualitative data related to the response processes of nine nursing college students obtained through cognitive interviews were analyzed. Results: Out of initial 30 items, 11 items were excluded after the analysis of difficulty and discrimination parameter. When the 19 items of the revised version of the CCTS were analyzed, levels of item difficulty were found to be relatively low and levels of discrimination were found to be appropriate or high. The degree of agreement between item developer intention and expert judgments equaled or exceeded 50%. Conclusion: From above results, evidence of the response process validity was demonstrated, indicating that subjects respondeds as intended by the test developer. The revised 19-item CCTS was found to have sufficient reliability and validity and will therefore represents a more convenient measurement of critical thinking ability.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Meta-analysis in Physical Therapy Education Research
Mitch Wolden, Brent Hill, Sara Farquhar Voorhees
Journal of Physical Therapy Education.2019; 33(1): 78. CrossRef
Effects of a work-based critical reflection program for novice nurses
Yeon Hee Kim, Ja Min, Soon Hee Kim, Sujin Shin
BMC Medical Education.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Measurement of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment in culturally diverse nursing students – A literature review
Christine L. Sommers
Nurse Education in Practice.2018; 30: 91. CrossRef
Individual and School Factors Affecting Critical Thinking Ability among Nursing Students
Sujin Shin, Inhee Park, Eunhee Hwang, Dukyoo Jung, Kon Hee Kim
Korean Medical Education Review.2018; 20(1): 44. CrossRef
The Health Professions Education Pathway: Preparing Students, Residents, and Fellows to Become Future Educators
H. Carrie Chen, Maria A. Wamsley, Amin Azzam, Katherine Julian, David M. Irby, Patricia S. O'Sullivan
Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2017; 29(2): 216. CrossRef
Cultivating Critical Thinking Using Virtual Interactive Case Studies
Susan M. Burke
Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2017; 33: 94. CrossRef
Encouraging Critical Clinical Thinking (CCT) Skills in First-Year Veterinary Students
Duncan C. Ferguson, Leslie Klis McNeil, David J. Schaeffe, Eric M. Mills
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.2017; 44(3): 531. CrossRef
Developing a Foundation for Interprofessional Education Within Nursing and Medical Curricula
Trisha Leann Horsley, Trent Reed, Keith Muccino, Donna Quinones, Viva Jo Siddall, Janet McCarthy
Nurse Educator.2016; 41(5): 234. CrossRef
Supervision in psychiatry
Joanna MacDonald, Pete M. Ellis
Current Opinion in Psychiatry.2012; 25(4): 322. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search