The study aimed at finding the value of letters of recommendation in predicting professional behavior problems in the clinical portion of a Doctor of Physical Therapy program learning cohorts from 2009-2014 in the United States. De-identified records of 137 Doctor of Physical Therapy graduates were examined by the descriptive statistics and comparison analysis. Thirty letters of recommendation were investigated based on grounded theory from 10 student applications with 5 randomly selected students of interest and 5 non-students of interest. Critical thinking, organizational skills, and judgement were statistically significant and quantitative differentiating characteristics. Qualitatively, significant characteristics of the student of interest included effective communication and cultural competency. Meanwhile, those of nonstudents of interest included conflicting personality descriptor, commitment to learning, balance, teamwork skills, potential future success, compatible learning skills, effective leadership skills, and emotional intelligence. Emerged significant characteristics did not consistently match common non-professional behavior issues encountered in clinic. Pre-admission data and letters of recommendation appear of limited value in predicting professional behavior performance in clinic.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Vital Role of Professionalism in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Julie K. Silver, Sara Cuccurullo, Lyn D. Weiss, Christopher Visco, Mooyeon Oh-Park, Danielle Perret Karimi, Walter R. Frontera, Talya K. Fleming, Glendaliz Bosques, Saurabha Bhatnagar, Anne Felicia Ambrose, Vu Q.C. Nguyen American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(4): 273. CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to explore the experiences of nursing students being trained to perform vaccinations. Methods: The grounded theory method was applied to gather information through semi-structured interviews. The participants included 14 undergraduate nursing students in their fifth and eighth semesters of study in a nursing school in Iran. The information was analyzed according to Strauss and Corbin’s method of grounded theory. Results: A core category of experiential learning was identified, and the following eight subcategories were extracted: students’ enthusiasm, vaccination sensitivity, stress, proper educational environment, absence of prerequisites, students’ responsibility for learning, providing services, and learning outcomes. Conclusion: The vaccination training of nursing students was found to be in an acceptable state. However, some barriers to effective learning were identified. As such, the results of this study may provide empirical support for attempts to reform vaccination education by removing these barriers.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Vaccine hesitancy educational tools for healthcare providers and trainees: A scoping review A. Lip, M. Pateman, M.M. Fullerton, H.M. Chen, L. Bailey, S. Houle, S. Davidson, C. Constantinescu Vaccine.2023; 41(1): 23. CrossRef
Frontline Involvement in Population COVID-19 Vaccinations: Lived Experience of Nursing Students Giulia Villa, Emanuele Galli, Sara Allieri, Riccardo Baldrighi, Adelaide Brunetti, Noemi Giannetta, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara Healthcare.2022; 10(10): 1985. CrossRef
Preparing Students for Difficult Conversations with Patients and Families Tiffani Chidume, Meghan C. Jones, Ann W. Lambert, Morgan Yordy Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2020; 46: 62. CrossRef