Ariel Shana Frey-Vogel, Kristina Dzara, Kimberly Anne Gifford, Yoon Soo Park, Justin Berk, Allison Heinly, Darcy Wolcott, Daniel Adam Hall, Shannon Elliott Scott-Vernaglia, Katherine Anne Sparger, Erica Ye-pyng Chung
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:3. Published online February 23, 2024
Purpose Despite educational mandates to assess resident teaching competence, limited instruments with validity evidence exist for this purpose. Existing instruments do not allow faculty to assess resident-led teaching in a large group format or whether teaching was interactive. This study gathers validity evidence on the use of the Resident-led Large Group Teaching Assessment Instrument (Relate), an instrument used by faculty to assess resident teaching competency. Relate comprises 23 behaviors divided into 6 elements: learning environment, goals and objectives, content of talk, promotion of understanding and retention, session management, and closure.
Methods Messick’s unified validity framework was used for this study. Investigators used video recordings of resident-led teaching from 3 pediatric residency programs to develop Relate and a rater guidebook. Faculty were trained on instrument use through frame-of-reference training. Resident teaching at all sites was video-recorded during 2018–2019. Two trained faculty raters assessed each video. Descriptive statistics on performance were obtained. Validity evidence sources include: rater training effect (response process), reliability and variability (internal structure), and impact on Milestones assessment (relations to other variables).
Results Forty-eight videos, from 16 residents, were analyzed. Rater training improved inter-rater reliability from 0.04 to 0.64. The Φ-coefficient reliability was 0.50. There was a significant correlation between overall Relate performance and the pediatric teaching Milestone (r=0.34, P=0.019).
Conclusion Relate provides validity evidence with sufficient reliability to measure resident-led large-group teaching competence.
Purpose To ensure faculty members’ active participation in education in response to growing demand, medical schools should clearly describe educational activities in their promotion regulations. This study analyzed the status of how medical education activities are evaluated in promotion regulations in 2022, in Korea.
Methods Data were collected from promotion regulations retrieved by searching the websites of 22 medical schools/universities in August 2022. To categorize educational activities and evaluation methods, the Association of American Medical Colleges framework for educational activities was utilized. Correlations between medical schools’ characteristics and the evaluation of medical educational activities were analyzed.
Results We defined 6 categories, including teaching, development of education products, education administration and service, scholarship in education, student affairs, and others, and 20 activities with 57 sub-activities. The average number of included activities was highest in the development of education products category and lowest in the scholarship in education category. The weight adjustment factors of medical educational activities were the characteristics of the target subjects and faculty members, the number of involved faculty members, and the difficulty of activities. Private medical schools tended to have more educational activities in the regulations than public medical schools. The greater the number of faculty members, the greater the number of educational activities in the education administration and service categories.
Conclusion Medical schools included various medical education activities and their evaluation methods in promotion regulations in Korea. This study provides basic data for improving the rewarding system for efforts of medical faculty members in education.
Purpose The current study aimed to identify the prevalence of burnout and related factors in nursing faculty members through a systematic review of the literature.
Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database was conducted via keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings, including burnout and nursing faculty, for studies published from database inception to April 1, 2022. The quality of the included studies in this review was assessed using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.
Results A total of 2,551 nursing faculty members were enrolled in 11 studies. The mean score of burnout in nursing faculty members based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was 59.28 out of 132. The burnout score in this study was presented in 3 MBI subscales: emotional exhaustion, 21.24 (standard deviation [SD]=9.70) out of 54; depersonalization, 5.88 (SD=4.20) out of 30; and personal accomplishment, 32.16 (SD=6.45) out of 48. Several factors had significant relationships with burnout in nursing faculty members, including gender, level of education, hours of work, number of classroom, students taught, full-time work, job pressure, perceived stress, subjective well-being, marital status, job satisfaction, work setting satisfaction, workplace empowerment, collegial support, management style, fulfillment of self-expectation, communication style, humor, and academic position.
Conclusion Overall, the mean burnout scores in nursing faculty members were moderate. Therefore, health policymakers and managers can reduce the likelihood of burnout in nursing faculty members by using psychosocial interventions and support.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Strategies to promote nurse educator well-being and prevent burnout: An integrative review Allan Lovern, Lindsay Quinlan, Stephanie Brogdon, Cora Rabe, Laura S. Bonanno Teaching and Learning in Nursing.2024; 19(2): 185. CrossRef
ALS Health care provider wellness Gregory Hansen, Sarah Burton-MacLeod, Kerri Lynn Schellenberg Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration.2024; 25(3-4): 299. CrossRef
Cuidando al profesorado: resultados de un programa a distancia de autocuidado para educadores de profesiones de la salud Denisse Zúñiga, Guadalupe Echeverría, Pía Nitsche, Nuria Pedrals, Attilio Rigotti, Marisol Sirhan, Klaus Puschel, Marcela Bitran Educación Médica.2024; 25(1): 100871. CrossRef
Civility and resilience practices to address chronic workplace stress in nursing academia Teresa M. Stephens, Cynthia M. Clark Teaching and Learning in Nursing.2024; 19(2): 119. CrossRef
Burnout among Chinese live streamers: Prevalence and correlates Shi Chen, Hanqin Wang, Shang Yang, Fushen Zhang, Xiao Gao, Ziwei Liu, Jenny Wilkinson PLOS ONE.2024; 19(5): e0301984. CrossRef
Holistic Wellness Support Systems for Nursing Faculty Ipuna Estavillo Black, LaTricia Perry, Hyunhwa Lee Nursing Education Perspectives.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Self-Care in Nursing Education Kimberly D. Kennel, Trina Barrett, Jami Smith Brown, Janet Tucker Journal of Nursing Education.2024; 63(6): 394. CrossRef
Using Caring Theory to Guide Application of Psychological PPE to Support Graduate Nurse Wellbeing in a Pandemic and Beyond Linda C. Cole, Lisa Boss, Marie McBee, Francine Snow Journal of Professional Nursing.2024; 54: 63. CrossRef
Factors influencing fatigue, mental workload and burnout among Chinese health care workers during public emergencies: an online cross-sectional study Qian Xiong, Feng Luo, Yue Chen, Yi Duan, Jie Huang, Hong Liu, Pengjuan Jin, Rong Li BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Advancing Equity and Justice in Academic Nursing Through Trauma-Informed Education Practice Rana Halabi Najjar, Kupiri Ackerman-Barger Journal of Nursing Education.2024; 63(8): 507. CrossRef
Should I stay or should I go? Nursing and midwifery academics intention to stay in or leave academia: A scoping review Marion Tower, Rachel Muir, Peta-Anne Zimmerman, Amanda G. Carter, Robyn Maude, Kathy Hollaway, Lynore Geia, Debbie Massey, Elizabeth Elder Nurse Education Today.2024; 142: 106352. CrossRef
The state of mental health, burnout, mattering and perceived wellness culture in Doctorally prepared nursing faculty with implications for action Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Lee Ann Strait, Cindy Beckett, Andreanna Pavan Hsieh, Jeffery Messinger, Randee Masciola Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing.2023; 20(2): 142. CrossRef
Pressures in the Ivory Tower: An Empirical Study of Burnout Scores among Nursing Faculty Sheila A. Boamah, Michael Kalu, Rosain Stennett, Emily Belita, Jasmine Travers International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(5): 4398. CrossRef
Understanding and Fostering Mental Health and Well-Being among University Faculty: A Narrative Review Dalal Hammoudi Halat, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Roua Dalli, Lama Alsarraj, Ahmed Malki Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(13): 4425. CrossRef
A mixed-methods study of the effectiveness and perceptions of a course design institute for health science educators Julie Speer, Quincy Conley, Derek Thurber, Brittany Williams, Mitzi Wasden, Brenda Jackson BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
This study aimed to investigate the degree to which newly appointed medical faculty members at the Catholic University of Korea are aware of Harden and Crosby’s 12 educational roles and to identify their preferred educational roles. A 12-item survey questionnaire was distributed to 110 participants, and 100 responses were included in the analysis. The respondents gave the highest score to “clinical or practical teacher” and the lowest score to “curriculum planner” for their current personal competencies. For their preferred personal future competencies, they assigned the highest score to “on the job role model” and the lowest score to “student assessor.” They gave almost equally high values to all 12 roles. However, individual faculty members had different preferences for educational roles. Accordingly, medical schools need to plan and implement customized faculty development programs, and efforts to provide appropriate educational roles according to individual faculty members’ preferences are needed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Self-directed learning quotient and common learning types of pre-medical students in Korea by the Multi-Dimensional Learning Strategy Test 2nd edition: a descriptive study Sun Kim, A Ra Cho, Chul Woon Chung Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 32. CrossRef
This study aimed to characterize the knowledge of evidence-based dentistry (EBD) among dental faculty members in the city of Bhopal in central India. A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered at two dental colleges in Bhopal City. All dental faculty members who were present on the day of the study and who agreed to participate were included in the study. A total of 50 dental faculty members returned the questionnaire. Six Likert-type questions were asked, and the percentages of various responses were used for analysis. Sixteen faculty members (32.0%) strongly agreed that EBD is a process of making decisions based on scientifically proven evidence. Fifteen faculty members (30.0%) strongly disagreed or disagreed with the item stating that the best and quickest way to find evidence is by reading textbooks or asking experienced colleagues. Thirteen faculty members (26.0%) strongly agreed that EBD allows dentists to improve their scientific knowledge and clinical skills. It is recommended that EBD be included in undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and in intensive continuing dental education programs that are conducted for dental faculty members.
Purpose The first year is stressful for new medical students who have to cope with curricular challenges, relocation issues, and separation from family. Mentoring reduces stress and facilitates adaptation. A program for faculty mentoring of first-semester students was initiated by the Medical Education Unit in 2009 at University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi. Feedback after the first year revealed that mentees were reluctant to meet their mentors, some of whom were senior faculty. In the following year, student mentors (near-peers) were recruited to see if that would improve the rate and quality of contact between mentees and mentors.
Methods Volunteer faculty (n=52), near-peers (n=57), and new entrants (n=148) admitted in 2010 participated in the ratio of 1:1:3. The program aims were explained through an open house meeting, for reinforcement, and another meeting was conducted 5 months later. At year-end, a feedback questionnaire was administered (response rate: faculty, 28 [54%]; mentees, 74 [50%]).
Results Many respondent faculty (27, 96%) and mentees (65, 88%) believed that near-peer mentoring was useful. Compared to the preceding year, the proportion of meetings between faculty mentors and mentees increased from 4.0±5.2 to 7.4±8.8; mentees who reported benefit increased from 23/78 (33%) to 34/74 (46%). Benefits resulted from mentors’ and near-peers’ demonstration of concern/support/interaction/counseling (35, 47.3% mentees); 23 mentees (82%) wanted to become near-peers themselves.
Conclusion Near-peer mentoring supplements faculty mentoring of first-year medical students by increasing system effectiveness.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Outcomes of a Near-Peer Intern Orientation Boot Camp Rashid Alhusain, Astha Saini, Hersimren Minhas, Ahmed K Ahmed, Patrick Bishop, Baraa Osman, Hajra Khan, Omeralfaroug Adam, Jarrett J Weinberger, Diane L Levine Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of peer mentoring in the study entry phase: A systematic review Laura Gehreke, Hannes Schilling, Simone Kauffeld Review of Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Uncovering heterogeneity in mental health changes among first-year medical students Sabine Polujanski, Ulrike Nett, Thomas Rotthoff, Melissa Oezsoy, Ann-Kathrin Schindler Medical Education Online.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A qualitative study of mentors’ perceptions and experiences of a near-peer mentoring program for medical students Lea Pölczman, Márk Jámbor, Zsuzsa Győrffy, György Purebl, András Végh, Edmond Girasek Frontiers in Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Impact on Peer Mentorship After Implementation of a Competency-Based Residency Curriculum in Canadian Radiation Oncology Training Programs David Y. Mak, Janet Papadakos, Joanne Alfieri, Jennifer Croke, Paris-Ann Ingledew, Shaun K. Loewen, Meredith Giuliani Advances in Radiation Oncology.2024; 9(5): 101462. CrossRef
PeTe (Peer Teaching) Mentors: How Near Peer Mentoring (NPM) Affects Academic Success and Retention in Design Education Tilanka Chandrasekera, Zahrasadat Hosseini, Aditya Jayadas, Lynn M. Boorady Innovative Higher Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
When medical students are autonomously motivated to mentor: a pilot study on confidence in clinical teaching and psychological well-being Revathi Nair, Tori Shmon, Adam Neufeld, Meredith McKague, Greg Malin Canadian Medical Education Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Peer Mentoring by Medical Students for Medical Students: A Scoping Review Christos Preovolos, Abby Grant, Morgan Rayner, Kylie Fitzgerald, Louisa Ng Medical Science Educator.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of a pilot virtual mentorship program for medical students interested in surgery Jihane Jadi, Elizabeth Shaughnessy, Linda Barry, Chantal Reyna, Susan Tsai, Stephanie M. Downs-Canner, Sara Myers The American Journal of Surgery.2023; 225(2): 229. CrossRef
Teaching students to mentor: Near-peer mentoring in undergraduate medical radiation science education Elio Arruzza Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences.2023; 54(1): 23. CrossRef
Introduction of Near-Peer Mentorship Program in an Undergraduate Medical College in Pakistan: A Pilot Study Narmeen Ahmed, Shaur Sarfaraz, Iram Khursheed, Zohaib Khurshid, Xiaojing Hu Education Research International.2023; 2023: 1. CrossRef
Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Support Services in Undergraduate Medical Training: A Multicenter, Qualitative Study Wen Qing Wendy Ye, Bradley A. Rietze, Sydney McQueen, Kevin Zhang, Lena C. Quilty, Christine M. Wickens Academic Medicine.2023; 98(4): 491. CrossRef
Implementing a Near Peer Instructor Placement Model in Physiotherapy Education Madeleine Simmons, Jasdeep Dhir, Sarah Wojkowski, Kristina K. Durham Physiotherapy Canada.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Addressing the needs and challenges of mentorship in veterinary medicine Amy B. Yanke, Kelly A. Weigand, Erik H. Hofmeister New Directions for Teaching and Learning.2023; 2023(176): 83. CrossRef
Pre-service Teachers’ Motivations to Participate in the Near-Peer Mentoring Program Dilara KARA-ZORLUOGLU, Ilkem OZDİNC, Busra KARGA, Gaye CEYHAN Sakarya University Journal of Education.2023; 13(3): 484. CrossRef
Piloting ‘Virtual Ward’: a novel platform for delivering medical student education by residents Coralea Kappel, Waseem Hijazi, Nishma Singhal BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Developing a well-received pre-matriculation program: the evolution of MedFIT Alexa Allen, Brandon Conner, Brooke Gantman, Kendal Warner, Ranna Nash, Brady Janes, Megan Hellum, Cherie Singer Discover Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Improving Outcomes for At-Risk MSW Students: A Pilot e-Mentorship Program Using A Near-Peer Model Donna L. Schuman, Rupal M. Parekh, Noelle L. Fields, Deborah Woody, Vivian J. Miller Journal of Teaching in Social Work.2021; 41(1): 42. CrossRef
Enhancing mentoring experiences through e-mentoring: a systematic scoping review of e-mentoring programs between 2000 and 2017 Jia Yan Chong, Ann Hui Ching, Yaazhini Renganathan, Wei Qiang Lim, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit K. R. Krishna Advances in Health Sciences Education.2020; 25(1): 195. CrossRef
Enhancing geriatric oncology training through a combination of novice mentoring and peer and near-peer mentoring: A thematic analysis ofmentoring in medicine between 2000 and 2017 Samuel Yong Siang Lim, Eugene Yong Hian Koh, Benjamin Jia Xing Tan, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit K.R. Krishna Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2020; 11(4): 566. CrossRef
Implementing Change in Neuroanatomy Education: Organization, Evolution, and Assessment of a Near‐Peer Teaching Program in an Undergraduate Medical School in Greece Stefanos Karamaroudis, Eleni Poulogiannopoulou, Marinos G. Sotiropoulos, Thomas Kalantzis, Elizabeth O. Johnson Anatomical Sciences Education.2020; 13(6): 694. CrossRef
Group mentorship for undergraduate medical students—a systematic review Elise Pauline Skjevik, J. Donald Boudreau, Unni Ringberg, Edvin Schei, Terese Stenfors, Monika Kvernenes, Eirik H. Ofstad Perspectives on Medical Education.2020; 9(5): 272. CrossRef
The Pivotal Role of Host Organizations in Enhancing Mentoring in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Kuang Teck Tay, Shiwei Xiao, Yao Hao Teo, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development.2020; 7: 238212052095664. CrossRef
Developing Humanistic Competencies Within the Competency-Based Curriculum Satendra Singh, Upreet Dhaliwal, Navjeevan Singh Indian Pediatrics.2020; 57(11): 1060. CrossRef
Structuring Mentoring in Medicine and Surgery. A Systematic Scoping Review of Mentoring Programs Between 2000 and 2019 Wen Jie Chua, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Fion Qian Hui Lee, Eugene Yong Hian Koh, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions.2020; 40(3): 158. CrossRef
A scoping review of mentor training programs in medicine between 1990 and 2017 Krish Sheri, Jue Ying Joan Too, Sing En Lydia Chuah, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Medical Education Online.2019; 24(1): 1555435. CrossRef
Establishing online mentorship for early career researchers: Lessons from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping International Mentoring Programme Natalia Bielczyk, Michele Veldsman, Ayaka Ando, Chiara Caldinelli, Meena M. Makary, Aki Nikolaidis, Marzia A. Scelsi, Melanie Stefan, AmanPreet Badhwar European Journal of Neuroscience.2019; 49(9): 1069. CrossRef
Perceived Benefits of a Peer Mentoring Program for First-Year Medical Students Samuel J. Altonji, James H. Baños, Caroline N. Harada Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2019; 31(4): 445. CrossRef
A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery Fion Qian Hui Lee, Wen Jie Chua, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Kuang Teck Tay, Eugene Koh Yong Hian, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development.2019; 6: 238212051988891. CrossRef
Improving Diversity of Dental Students Through the Boston University Master's of Oral Health Sciences Postbaccalaureate Program Theresa A. Davies, Elizabeth Kaye, Michele Stahlberger, Majed Abbas, Catherine Sarkis, Linda Reed, Larry Dunham, Barbara M. Schreiber, Cataldo Leone, Ana Karina Mascarenhas Journal of Dental Education.2019; 83(3): 287. CrossRef
Value of Near-Peer Mentorship from Protégé and Mentor Perspectives: A Strategy to Increase Physician Workforce Diversity Adrianne Haggins, Gurjit Sandhu, Paula T. Ross Journal of the National Medical Association.2018; 110(4): 399. CrossRef
Development of a systematic career coaching program for medical students Yera Hur, A Ra Cho, Mihye Kwon Korean Journal of Medical Education.2018; 30(1): 41. CrossRef
A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students Olawunmi Akinla, Pamela Hagan, William Atiomo BMC Medical Education.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the possibility of one-on-one mentoring as an alternative to the current student support system in medical education Yera Hur, A Ra Cho, Sun Kim Korean Journal of Medical Education.2018; 30(2): 119. CrossRef
Vertical Alignment of Educational Opportunities for STEM Learners: Evaluating the Effects of Road Dust on Biological Systems Jason A. Rosenzweig, Daniel Vrinceanu, Hyun-Min Hwang, Shishir Shishodia The American Biology Teacher.2016; 78(9): 710. CrossRef
Purpose College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, United Arab Emirates, underwent a major curriculum change from a discipline-based to an organ system-based integrated curriculum. However, it was not known how the faculty perceived the changes in the educational environment as experienced by the students. In this context, we aimed to compare the faculty perceptions of the student experiences in the discipline-based curriculum with those in the organ system-based integrated curriculum.
Methods The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire was modified to assess faculty perceptions of the student experiences, pilot-tested, and administered to all faculty members (n=28) involved in the discipline-based curriculum (FDC) in January 2009. In the subsequent year, data were collected from the same faculty involved in the new integrated curriculum (FIC). Collected data were transferred to Predictive Analytics Software version 18. Total, domain, and individual statement scores were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Percentage agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty were assessed by the McNemar’s test for proportion.
Results The mean total DREEM score was significantly higher (P<0.001) for FIC (139/200) as compared to FDC (119/200). The FIC perceived significantly more positive student experiences with the educational environment as indicated by the domain scores and statement scores. The differences in proportions of agreement between FIC and FDC also reinforced that the FIC perceived more positive student experiences with the educational environment.
Conclusion The study showed that the faculty perceived the organ system-based integrated curriculum as providing a better educational environment for the students than the discipline based curriculum.
A team-based Learning (TBL) tutor training workshop on research and publication ethics was offered to 8 faculty members and 3 staff at Hallym University in 2009. To investigate the effect of the workshop and any attitude changes, a questionnaire survey was performed after the 8-hr course. Questions in four categories-general course content, change in attitudes toward research and publication ethics, the TBL format, and an open-ended question about the course--were included. Participants responded positively to all items on general course content. There was a positive change in attitude on research and publication ethics. Participants also responded positively to six items on team-based learning. The overall positive response to the workshop on research and publication ethics suggested the effectiveness of this kind of TBL tutor training course for university faculty and staff.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Faculty Development Effectiveness: Insights from a Program Evaluation Anupma Wadhwa, Lopamudra Das, Savithiri Ratnapalan Journal of Biomedical Education.2014; 2014: 1. CrossRef
Perspective Paul Haidet, Ruth E. Levine, Dean X. Parmelee, Sheila Crow, Frances Kennedy, P. Adam Kelly, Linda Perkowski, Larry Michaelsen, Boyd F. Richards Academic Medicine.2012; 87(3): 292. CrossRef