Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Karima Khamisa"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Brief reports
No observed effect of a student-led mock objective structured clinical examination on subsequent performance scores in medical students in Canada  
Lorenzo Madrazo, Claire Bo Lee, Meghan McConnell, Karima Khamisa, Debra Pugh
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:14.   Published online May 27, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.14
  • 14,114 View
  • 203 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Student-led peer-assisted mock objective structured clinical examinations (MOSCEs) have been used in various settings to help students prepare for subsequent higher-stakes, faculty-run OSCEs. MOSCE participants generally valued feedback from peers and reported benefits to learning. Our study investigated whether participation in a peer-assisted MOSCE affected subsequent OSCE performance. To determine whether mean OSCE scores differed depending on whether medical students participated in the MOSCE, we conducted a between-subjects analysis of variance, with cohort (2016 vs. 2017) and MOSCE participation (MOSCE vs. no MOSCE) as independent variables and the mean OSCE score as the dependent variable. Participation in the MOSCE had no influence on mean OSCE scores (P=0.19). There was a significant correlation between mean MOSCE scores and mean OSCE scores (Pearson r=0.52, P<0.001). Although previous studies described self-reported benefits from participation in student-led MOSCEs, it was not associated with objective benefits in this study.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of familiarity with the format of the exam on performance in the OSCE of undergraduate medical students – an interventional study
    Hannes Neuwirt, Iris E. Eder, Philipp Gauckler, Lena Horvath, Stefan Koeck, Maria Noflatscher, Benedikt Schaefer, Anja Simeon, Verena Petzer, Wolfgang M. Prodinger, Christoph Berendonk
    BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perceived and actual value of Student‐led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations
    Brandon Stretton, Adam Montagu, Aline Kunnel, Jenni Louise, Nathan Behrendt, Joshua Kovoor, Stephen Bacchi, Josephine Thomas, Ellen Davies
    The Clinical Teacher.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Benefits of semiology taught using near-peer tutoring are sustainable
    Benjamin Gripay, Thomas André, Marie De Laval, Brice Peneau, Alexandre Secourgeon, Nicolas Lerolle, Cédric Annweiler, Grégoire Justeau, Laurent Connan, Ludovic Martin, Loïc Bière
    BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification des facteurs associés à la réussite aux examens cliniques objectifs et structurés dans la faculté de médecine de Rouen
    M. Leclercq, M. Vannier, Y. Benhamou, A. Liard, V. Gilard, I. Auquit-Auckbur, H. Levesque, L. Sibert, P. Schneider
    La Revue de Médecine Interne.2022; 43(5): 278.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Experience of Peer-led Mock Objective Structured Practical Examination for First- and Second-year Medical Students
    Faisal Alsaif, Lamia Alkuwaiz, Mohammed Alhumud, Reem Idris, Lina Neel, Mansour Aljabry, Mona Soliman
    Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2022; Volume 13: 987.     CrossRef
  • The use of a formative OSCE to prepare emergency medicine residents for summative OSCEs: a mixed-methods cohort study
    Magdalene Hui Min Lee, Dong Haur Phua, Kenneth Wei Jian Heng
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tutor–Student Partnership in Practice OSCE to Enhance Medical Education
    Eve Cosker, Valentin Favier, Patrice Gallet, Francis Raphael, Emmanuelle Moussier, Louise Tyvaert, Marc Braun, Eva Feigerlova
    Medical Science Educator.2021; 31(6): 1803.     CrossRef
  • Peers as OSCE assessors for junior medical students – a review of routine use: a mixed methods study
    Simon Schwill, Johanna Fahrbach-Veeser, Andreas Moeltner, Christiane Eicher, Sonia Kurczyk, David Pfisterer, Joachim Szecsenyi, Svetla Loukanova
    BMC Medical Education.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
The implementation and evaluation of an e-Learning training module for objective structured clinical examination raters in Canada  
Karima Khamisa, Samantha Halman, Isabelle Desjardins, Mireille St. Jean, Debra Pugh
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:18.   Published online August 6, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.18
  • 22,895 View
  • 253 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Improving the reliability and consistency of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) raters’ marking poses a continual challenge in medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an e-Learning training module for OSCE raters who participated in the assessment of third-year medical students at the University of Ottawa, Canada. The effects of online training and those of traditional in-person (face-to-face) orientation were compared. Of the 90 physicians recruited as raters for this OSCE, 60 consented to participate (67.7%) in the study in March 2017. Of the 60 participants, 55 rated students during the OSCE, while the remaining 5 were back-up raters. The number of raters in the online training group was 41, while that in the traditional in-person training group was 19. Of those with prior OSCE experience (n= 18) who participated in the online group, 13 (68%) reported that they preferred this format to the in-person orientation. The total average time needed to complete the online module was 15 minutes. Furthermore, 89% of the participants felt the module provided clarity in the rater training process. There was no significant difference in the number of missing ratings based on the type of orientation that raters received. Our study indicates that online OSCE rater training is comparable to traditional face-to-face orientation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
    Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 11.     CrossRef
  • Empirical analysis comparing the tele-objective structured clinical examination and the in-person assessment in Australia
    Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 23.     CrossRef
  • No observed effect of a student-led mock objective structured clinical examination on subsequent performance scores in medical students in Canada
    Lorenzo Madrazo, Claire Bo Lee, Meghan McConnell, Karima Khamisa, Debra Pugh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 14.     CrossRef
  • ОБ’ЄКТИВНИЙ СТРУКТУРОВАНИЙ КЛІНІЧНИЙ ІСПИТ ЯК ВИМІР ПРАКТИЧНОЇ ПІДГОТОВКИ МАЙБУТНЬОГО ЛІКАРЯ
    M. M. Korda, A. H. Shulhai, N. V. Pasyaka, N. V. Petrenko, N. V. Haliyash, N. A. Bilkevich
    Медична освіта.2019; (3): 19.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions