Higher levels of self-efficacy and readiness for a future career among Spanish-speaking physician assistant students after their volunteer work at a student-run free clinic in the United States

Article information

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16.27

Publication date (electronic) : 2019 September 6

doi : https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.27

Shannon Weaver¹, Zainub Hussaini², Virginia Lynn Valentin¹, Samin Panahi², Sarah Elizabeth Levitt³, Jeanie Ashby⁴, Akiko Kamimura^2,

¹Division of Physician Assistant Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

²Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

³Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

⁴Maliheh Free Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Editor: Sun Huh, Hallym University, Korea

^*Corresponding email: akiko.kamimura@utah.edu

Received 2019 July 17; Accepted 2019 September 6.

Abstract

Ethics statement

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Utah approved the study protocol (IRB approval no., 00072275). Informed consent was obtained from the participating students.

Study design

This was an observational study based on a questionnaire survey after subjects had experienced volunteering at a free clinic that serves patients with incomes up to 150% of the federal poverty line.

Study participants and data collection

This study was conducted at a PA program at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, in the intermountain west region of the USA. Students at this program can volunteer at a PA student-run free clinic on Thursday nights. Data were collected from 56 PA students at the University of Utah using a quantitative approach (a survey) in October 2018. The survey response rate was 45% for first-year students (n=18) and 60% for second-year students (n=38) (Supplement 1).

Questionnaire survey

Students’ self-perceptions of knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward working with the underserved, perceived self-efficacy of working with underserved patients, and interest in primary care were measured using a scale developed by Smith et al. [5]. The original scale focused on homeless populations. For this study, the word “homeless” was replaced by “the underserved.” The scale has 15 items with 6 sub-scales asking participants to rate the effect of volunteering at the free clinic: knowledge (4 items, Cronbach α=0.891; e.g., “My degree of knowledge about the problems of the underserved”); skills (2 items, Cronbach α=0.873; e.g., “My clinical skills in the care of the underserved”); attitudes (2 items, Cronbach α=0.945); self-efficacy (5-items, Cronbach α=0.923; e.g., “I feel capable of caring for the underserved”); interest in future work with the underserved (1 item, “My interest in working with the underserved after I graduate”); and interest in primary care (1 item, “My interest in being a primary care physician assistant”). A 7-point Likert scale (1=not at all, 7=a great deal) was used. Scoring was based on the mean of the items in the same sub-scale. The survey questionnaire is presented in Appendix 1.

Data analysis

The response data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics included frequency and percentage for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. General linear model regression analysis was performed to examine the associations between the impact of volunteering at a free clinic and demographic characteristics. Collinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor, and no significant collinearity was found.

Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of 56 first- and second-year student participants out of 87 subjects (64.4%). Thirty-two participants were female (57.1%). Nineteen participants were aged under 30 (33.9%). Twenty-two participants had 5 years or less of clinical experience (39.3%). Twenty-five participants could communicate with patients in Spanish (44.6%). Table 2 presents descriptive statistics. Out of the 3 sub-scales (attitudes, effect, and readiness), students responded most positively to items exploring the effect of their experiences of volunteering at the free clinic. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics (independent variables) and attitude, effect, and readiness (dependent variables) (Table 3). Being able to speak Spanish was the only influencing factor; speaking Spanish was associated with higher levels of self-efficacy (P<0.01), effect (P<0.01), and readiness (P<0.05) in regard to volunteering at the free clinic.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants (N=56)

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of the variables used in regression analysis for each sub-scale

Table 3.

P-values and confidence intervals for each demographic characteristic according to the response categories of the measurement tool

The major finding of the quantitative analysis was that speaking Spanish was associated with higher levels of self-efficacy and readiness to be a PA. While there is a lack of information surrounding the success of bilingual health profession students, significant data exist regarding the impact of language barriers on patient-provider relations. A study found that language barriers in a clinical setting could cause many obstacles to providing the best care [6].

In conclusion, volunteering at a free clinic during PA school was correlated with increased knowledge, skills, attitudes, self-efficacy, interest in future work with the underserved, and interest in primary care among Spanish-speaking PA students after their volunteer work at a student-run free clinic in the United States. As the PA career is a vital part of the US health care system, PA students should continue to be studied in greater depth. Future studies should be longitudinal in nature and explore the study outcomes and career choices of PA students.

Supplementary materials

Article information Continued