Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Standards"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Research article
Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study  
Ying-Ying Yang, Pin-Hsiang Huang, Ling-Yu Yang, Chia-Chang Huang, Chih-Wei Liu, Shiau-Shian Huang, Chen-Huan Chen, Fa-Yauh Lee, Shou-Yen Kao, Boaz Shulruf
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:27.   Published online October 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.27
  • 1,747 View
  • 117 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Undertaking a standard-setting exercise is a common method for setting pass/fail cut scores for high-stakes examinations. The recently introduced equal Z standard-setting method (EZ method) has been found to be a valid and effective alternative for the commonly used Angoff and Hofstee methods and their variants. The current study aims to estimate the minimum number of panelists required for obtaining acceptable and reliable cut scores using the EZ method.
Methods
The primary data were extracted from 31 panelists who used the EZ method for setting cut scores for a 12-station of medical school’s final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Taiwan. For this study, a new data set composed of 1,000 random samples of different panel sizes, ranging from 5 to 25 panelists, was established and analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to measure the differences in the cut scores set by the sampled groups, across all sizes within each station.
Results
On average, a panel of 10 experts or more yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 90% and 15 experts yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 95%. No significant differences in cut scores associated with panel size were identified for panels of 5 or more experts.
Conclusion
The EZ method was found to be valid and feasible. Less than an hour was required for 12 panelists to assess 12 OSCE stations. Calculating the cut scores required only basic statistical skills.
Original Article
Development of Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of Baccalaureate Nursing Education Program
Yang Heui Ahn, Kyung Sook Park, Soon Ok Yang, Kyung Rim Shin, Mi Ja Kim
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2005;2(1):87-103.   Published online June 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2005.2.1.87
  • 26,642 View
  • 160 Download
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The goal of accreditation is to ensure that the education provided by an institution of higher education meets an acceptable level of quality. This study developed standards and criteria for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, by comparing accreditation in South Korea and in the United States, and validating standards and criteria. A main comparative analysis was made between Nursing League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) standards, Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) standards for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, and Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing standards for accreditation of nursing education programs. The research team developed and validated standards and criteria for South Korean baccalaureate nursing education programs. Using the results of the analysis, revisions are proposed to standards for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, and categorized into 24 criteria and six domains: mission and governance, curriculum and teaching-learning practices, students, faculty, resources, effectiveness. Further studies are required to refine the standards and criteria and make them sophisticated enough to be applied globally.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and Psychometric Testing of a Self-Rated Scale Based on National Nursing Core Competency Standards
    Al D. Biag, Vanessa L. Belen
    Journal of Nursing Measurement.2022; 30(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • The Positive Effects of Accreditation on Graduate Medical Education Programs in Singapore
    Kathleen D. Holt, Rebecca S. Miller, Lauren M. Byrne, Susan H. Day
    Journal of Graduate Medical Education.2019; 11(4s): 213.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Survey of Interdisciplinary Unification of Biomedical Laboratory Science
    Hong Sung Kim, Ji-Hyuk Kang, Man-Gil Yang, Chang-Eun Park, Kyung-A Shin, Pil Seung Kwon
    The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science.2018; 50(3): 289.     CrossRef
  • Development and Evaluation of Korean Nurses’ Core Competency Scale (KNCCS)
    Won-Hee Lee, Sanghee Kim, Jihyoun An
    Open Journal of Nursing.2017; 07(05): 599.     CrossRef
  • Direction of the Community Health Nursing Practice Education Focusing on the Nursing Education Accreditation Criteria
    Kyung Ja June, Young Ran Chin, Hee Girl Kim, Chun Mi Kim, Yeon Yi Song, Souk Young Kim, Hanju Lee, Ihn Sook Jeong, Ki Soon Seo, Kyung Won Choi
    Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2016; 27(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • A study on Korean nursing students' educational outcomes
    Kasil Oh, Yang Heui Ahn, Hyang-Yeon Lee, Sook-Ja Lee, In-Ja Kim, Kyung-Sook Choi, Myung-Sook Ko
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2011; 8: 3.     CrossRef
  • Faculty Perceptions of the Improvement and Effort for the Achievement of Quality in Nursing Education through Accreditation in Baccalaureate Nursing Programs
    Kon Hee Kim
    Korean Medical Education Review.2011; 13(2): 59.     CrossRef
Review Article
Critical Thinking and the Standards of Nursing Education
Yang Heui Ahn
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2004;1(1):99-106.   Published online January 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2004.1.1.99
  • 65,535 View
  • 295 Download
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Critical thinking is the basis of professional nursing practice and is essential in the current complex health care delivery system. A major goal of baccalaureate nursing education is the development and promotion of students' ability to think critically. In America, the National League for nursing outcome-oriented accreditation process challenged nursing faculty to think about teaching and evaluating critical thinking. Based on nursing literature, the findings were inconsistent because of a lack of consensus on a definition of critical thinking and the measurement of critical thinking utilizing critical thinking instruments non-specific for nursing. However, a variety of teaching-learning strategies in nursing education were effective in the development of critical thinking dispositions and skills among nursing students. The author provides insight and ideas for nursing faculty as follows: 1) nursing programs must define critical thinking operationally in relation to their curricula; 2)nursing faculty must be knowledgeable concerning evaluation of critical thinking disposition and skills and construct a standardized critical-thinking instrument that is specific to the discipline of nursing; 3) nursing faculty must develop teaching-learning strategy in nursing education for improving students' critical thinking abilities. These are prerequisite for critical thinking which should be considered as a criterion in The Standards of Nursing Education in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Factors Influencing Competency in Evidence-based Practice among Clinical Nurses
    Yeon-Sook Kim, Jimee Kim, Mi-Mi Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2015; 21(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Video-based Peer assisted Learning in Standardized Patients Simulation: Pre and Post Operative Care
    In-Hee Park, Sujin Shin
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Critical Thinking Disposition on Satisfaction with Clinical Practice and Intention of Recommendation among Paramedic Students
    Mi-Young Choi, Tae-Young Moon, Hyun-Ji Lee
    Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2013; 14(3): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Nursing Education Modality for Facilitating Undergraduate Students' Critical Thinking: Focus Group Interview Analysis
    Sung Ok Chang, Eun Suk Kong, Chun Gil Kim, Hee Kyung Kim, Mi Soon Song, Soo Yeon Ahn, Young Whee Lee, Myung Ok Cho, Kyung Sook Choi, Nam Cho Kim
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2013; 25(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Critical Thinking Disposition and Self-esteem of Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses
    Moonhee Gang
    Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2011; 20(4): 404.     CrossRef
  • Development of Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of Baccalaureate Nursing Education Program
    Yang Heui Ahn, Kyung Sook Park, Soon Ok Yang, Kyung Rim Shin, Mi Ja Kim
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2005; 2: 87.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions