Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Forthcoming articles > Article
Educational/Faculty development material The role of large language models in the peer-review process: opportunities and challenges for medical journal reviewers and editors
Jisoo Lee1orcid, Jieun Lee2orcid, Jeong-Ju Yoo2*orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.4 [Epub ahead of print]
Published online: January 16, 2025

1Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

*Corresponding email:  puby17@naver.com

Editor: Sun Huh, Hallym University, Korea

• Received: 6 December 2024   • Accepted: 2 January 2025
prev next
  • 807 Views
  • 117 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

The peer review process ensures the integrity of scientific research. This is particularly important in the medical field, where research findings directly impact patient care. However, the rapid growth of publications has strained reviewers, causing delays and potential declines in quality. Generative artificial intelligence, especially large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, may assist researchers with efficient, high-quality reviews. This review explores the integration of LLMs into peer review, highlighting their strengths in linguistic tasks and challenges in assessing scientific validity, particularly in clinical medicine. Key points for integration include initial screening, reviewer matching, feedback support, and language review. However, implementing LLMs for these purposes will necessitate addressing biases, privacy concerns, and data confidentiality. We recommend using LLMs as complementary tools under clear guidelines to support, not replace, human expertise in maintaining rigorous peer review standards.

Figure

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
TOP