Purpose The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is considered to be one of the most robust methods of clinical assessment. One of its strengths lies in its ability to minimise the effects of examiner bias due to the standardisation of items and tasks for each candidate. However, OSCE examiners’ assessment scores are influenced by several factors that may jeopardise the assumed objectivity of OSCEs. To better understand this phenomenon, the current review aims to determine and describe important sources of examiner bias and the factors affecting examiners’ assessments.
Methods We performed a narrative review of the medical literature using Medline. All articles meeting the selection criteria were reviewed, with salient points extracted and synthesised into a clear and comprehensive summary of the knowledge in this area.
Results OSCE examiners’ assessment scores are influenced by factors belonging to 4 different domains: examination context, examinee characteristics, examinee-examiner interactions, and examiner characteristics. These domains are composed of several factors including halo, hawk/dove and OSCE contrast effects; the examiner’s gender and ethnicity; training; lifetime experience in assessing; leadership and familiarity with students; station type; and site effects.
Conclusion Several factors may influence the presumed objectivity of examiners’ assessments, and these factors need to be addressed to ensure the objectivity of OSCEs. We offer insights into directions for future research to better understand and address the phenomenon of examiner bias.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Does following an “excellent” candidate in the objective structured clinical examination affect your checklist score? Craig Brown, Mintu Nath, Wendy Watson, Mary Joan Macleod Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2024; 16(3): 891. CrossRef
A Look at Demographics and Transition to Virtual Assessments: An Analysis of Bias in the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Exams Beatriz Ibáñez, Andrew T. Jones, D. Rohan Jeyarajah, Daniel L. Dent, Caroline Prendergast, Carol L. Barry Journal of Surgical Education.2024; 81(4): 578. CrossRef
Analyse systématique des évaluations de circuits multiples d’examen clinique objectif structuré (ECOS) : variables explicatives et corrélations inter-évaluateurs E. Ollier, C. Pelissier, C. Boissier, T. Barjat, P. Berthelot, C. Boutet, X. Gocko, C. Le Hello, S. Perinel La Revue de Médecine Interne.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Tailoring support following summative assessments: a latent profile analysis of student outcomes across five medical specialities Huiming Ding, Matt Homer Advances in Health Sciences Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of simulated patient-based communication training vs. real patient-based communication training on empathetic behaviour in undergraduate students – a prospective evaluation study Vanessa Britz, Jasmina Sterz, Yannik Koch, Teresa Schreckenbach, Maria-Christina Stefanescu, Uwe Zinßer, Rene Danilo Verboket, Katharina Sommer, Miriam Ruesseler BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Educational guidelines for diversity and inclusion: addressing racism and eliminating biases in medical education Samantha D. Buery-Joyner, Laura Baecher-Lind, Camille A. Clare, B. Star Hampton, Michael D. Moxley, Dotun Ogunyemi, Archana A. Pradhan, Shireen M. Madani Sims, Sara Whetstone, Mark B. Woodland, Nadine T. Katz American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2023; 228(2): 133. CrossRef
Quality Management of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations at a Multicampus Nursing College: A Pilot Study Thandolwakhe Nyangeni, Dalena R.M. van Rooyen, Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi Journal of Nursing Education.2023; 62(3): 155. CrossRef
Scoring consistency of standard patients and examiners in the developed dental objective structured clinical examination system Feng Zhu, Li Wu, Xiuxiu Shao, Lijuan Huang, Xiangfeng Meng, Rongrong Nie BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessing the utility of a novel entrustment‐supervision assessment tool Sebastian Dewhirst, Timothy J. Wood, Warren J. Cheung, Jason R. Frank Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pre-COVID and COVID experience of objective structured clinical examination as a learning tool for post-graduate residents in Obstetrics & Gynecology-a quality improvement study Charu Sharma, Pratibha Singh, Shashank Shekhar, Abhishek Bhardwaj, Manisha Jhirwal, Navdeep Kaur Ghuman, Meenakshi Gothwal, Garima Yadav, Priyanka Kathuria, Vibha Mishra Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2023; 66(4): 316. CrossRef
Interactions between the sex of the clinician grader and the sex of the chiropractic student intern on spinal manipulation assessment grade Michael Sheppard, Stephanie Johnson, Victor Quiroz, John Ward Journal of Chiropractic Education.2023; 37(2): 157. CrossRef
Objective structured clinical examination for teaching and assessment: Evidence-based critique Pooja Dewan, Sumaira Khalil, Piyush Gupta Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health.2023; : 101477. CrossRef
PERCEPTION OF MEDICAL STUDENTS AND EXAMINERS TOWARDS OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION: A FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT Rozhan Sediq, Jamal Salih, Fattah Fattah, Adnan Hassan JOURNAL OF SULAIMANI MEDICAL COLLEGE.2023; 13(1): 57. CrossRef
Response to: Twelve tips for conducting a virtual OSCE Mohamed Guled, Juned Islam, Haseeb Qureshi Medical Teacher.2022; 44(1): 101. CrossRef
Comparison of OSCE performance between 6- and 7-year medical school curricula in Taiwan Jr-Wei Wu, Hao-Min Cheng, Shiau-Shian Huang, Jen-Feng Liang, Chia-Chang Huang, Ling-Yu Yang, Boaz Shulruf, Ying-Ying Yang, Chen-Huan Chen, Ming-Chih Hou, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Associated With Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic and Clinical Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study Ensieh Fooladi, Md Nazmul Karim, Sheila Vance, Lorraine Walker, Maya Ebrahimi Zanjani, Dragan Ilic, Gabrielle Brand Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Medical Students’ Perception of a Newly Implemented Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma: A Mixed-Method Study Asser Sallam, Hani Atwa, Adel Abdelaziz, Asmaa Abdel Nasser Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health.2022; 22(1): 29. CrossRef
Using Think-aloud Interviews to Examine a Clinically Oriented Performance Assessment Rubric Mary Roduta Roberts, Chad M. Gotch, Megan Cook, Karin Werther, Iris C. I. Chao Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives.2022; 20(3): 139. CrossRef
Objective structured clinical examination: Challenges and opportunities from students’ perspective Nazdar Alkhateeb, Abubakir Majeed Salih, Nazar Shabila, Ali Al-Dabbagh, Ayse Hilal Bati PLOS ONE.2022; 17(9): e0274055. CrossRef
Medical school grades may predict future clinical competence Jr-Wei Wu, Hao-Min Cheng, Shiau-Shian Huang, Jen-Feng Liang, Chia-Chang Huang, Boaz Shulruf, Ying-Ying Yang, Chen-Huan Chen, Ming-Chih Hou, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2022; 85(9): 909. CrossRef
Development and Evaluation of an Online Exam for Exercise Physiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic Amanda L Burdett, Nancy van Doorn, Matthew D Jones, Natalie CG Kwai, Rachel E Ward, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology.2022; 11(4): 122. CrossRef
eOSCE stations live versus remote evaluation and scores variability Donia Bouzid, Jimmy Mullaert, Aiham Ghazali, Valentine Marie Ferré, France Mentré, Cédric Lemogne, Philippe Ruszniewski, Albert Faye, Alexy Tran Dinh, Tristan Mirault, Nathan Peiffer Smadja, Léonore Muller, Laure Falque Pierrotin, Michael Thy, Maksud Assa BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study Ying-Ying Yang, Pin-Hsiang Huang, Ling-Yu Yang, Chia-Chang Huang, Chih-Wei Liu, Shiau-Shian Huang, Chen-Huan Chen, Fa-Yauh Lee, Shou-Yen Kao, Boaz Shulruf Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 27. CrossRef
Augmenting physician examiner scoring in objective structured clinical examinations: including the standardized patient perspective Marguerite Roy, Josée Wojcik, Ilona Bartman, Sydney Smee Advances in Health Sciences Education.2021; 26(1): 313. CrossRef
Re-conceptualising and accounting for examiner (cut-score) stringency in a ‘high frequency, small cohort’ performance test Matt Homer Advances in Health Sciences Education.2021; 26(2): 369. CrossRef
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests Majid Yousefi Afrashteh BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Examiners’ decision‐making processes in observation‐based clinical examinations Bunmi S. Malau‐Aduli, Richard B. Hays, Karen D’Souza, Amy M. Smith, Karina Jones, Richard Turner, Lizzi Shires, Jane Smith, Shannon Saad, Cassandra Richmond, Antonio Celenza, Tarun Sen Gupta Medical Education.2021; 55(3): 344. CrossRef
Tutor–Student Partnership in Practice OSCE to Enhance Medical Education Eve Cosker, Valentin Favier, Patrice Gallet, Francis Raphael, Emmanuelle Moussier, Louise Tyvaert, Marc Braun, Eva Feigerlova Medical Science Educator.2021; 31(6): 1803. CrossRef
Perception of Students and Examiners about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in a Teaching Hospital in Ethiopia Henok Fisseha, Hailemichael Desalegn Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2021; Volume 12: 1439. CrossRef
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Learning Outcomes of Medical Students in Taiwan: A Two-Year Prospective Cohort Study of OSCE Performance Tzyy-Yurn Tzeng, Chia-An Hsu, Ying-Ying Yang, Eunice J. Yuan, Ya-Ting Chang, Tzu-Hao Li, Chung-Pin Li, Jen-Feng Liang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Chia-Chang Huang, Ming-Chih Hou, Chen-Huan Chen, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 19(1): 208. CrossRef
Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 11. CrossRef
Versatility in multiple mini-interview implementation: Rater background does not significantly influence assessment scoring Keith D. Baker, Roy T. Sabo, Meagan Rawls, Moshe Feldman, Sally A. Santen Medical Teacher.2020; 42(4): 411. CrossRef
Qualifying online assessment during COVID-19 pandemic: Reflecting on our experience under the cognitive lens of Miller’s pyramid Dinesh Kumar, Rajasekhar Sajja SN Research and Development in Medical Education.2020; 9(1): 15. CrossRef
Comparison of the effects of simulated patient clinical skill training and student roleplay on objective structured clinical examination performance among medical students in Australia Silas Taylor, Matthew Haywood, Boaz Shulruf Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 3. CrossRef
Insights into student assessment outcomes in rural clinical campuses Boaz Shulruf, Gary Velan, Lesley Forster, Anthony O’Sullivan, Peter Harris, Silas Taylor BMC Medical Education.2019;[Epub] CrossRef