Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) with respect to standardized urology multiple-choice items in the United States.
Methods In total, 700 multiple-choice urology board exam-style items were submitted to GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, and responses were recorded. Items were categorized based on topic and question complexity (recall, interpretation, and problem-solving). The accuracy of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was compared across item types in February 2024.
Results GPT-4 answered 44.4% of items correctly compared to 30.9% for GPT-3.5 (P<0.00001). GPT-4 (vs. GPT-3.5) had higher accuracy with urologic oncology (43.8% vs. 33.9%, P=0.03), sexual medicine (44.3% vs. 27.8%, P=0.046), and pediatric urology (47.1% vs. 27.1%, P=0.012) items. Endourology (38.0% vs. 25.7%, P=0.15), reconstruction and trauma (29.0% vs. 21.0%, P=0.41), and neurourology (49.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.11) items did not show significant differences in performance across versions. GPT-4 also outperformed GPT-3.5 with respect to recall (45.9% vs. 27.4%, P<0.00001), interpretation (45.6% vs. 31.5%, P=0.0005), and problem-solving (41.8% vs. 34.5%, P=0.56) type items. This difference was not significant for the higher-complexity items.
Conclusions ChatGPT performs relatively poorly on standardized multiple-choice urology board exam-style items, with GPT-4 outperforming GPT-3.5. The accuracy was below the proposed minimum passing standards for the American Board of Urology’s Continuing Urologic Certification knowledge reinforcement activity (60%). As artificial intelligence progresses in complexity, ChatGPT may become more capable and accurate with respect to board examination items. For now, its responses should be scrutinized.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
From GPT-3.5 to GPT-4.o: A Leap in AI’s Medical Exam Performance Markus Kipp Information.2024; 15(9): 543. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence can Facilitate Application of Risk Stratification Algorithms to Bladder Cancer Patient Case Scenarios Max S Yudovich, Ahmad N Alzubaidi, Jay D Raman Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to detect relationships between undergraduate students’ attitudes toward communication skills learning and demographic variables (such as age, academic year, and gender). Understanding these relationships could provide information for communication skills facilitators and curriculum planners on structuring course delivery and integrating communication skills training into the medical curriculum.
Methods The descriptive study involved a survey of 369 undergraduate students from 2 medical schools in Zambia who participated in communication skills training stratified by academic year using the Communication Skills Attitude Scale. Data were collected between October and December 2021 and analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows version 28.0.
Results One-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in attitude between at least 5 academic years. There was a significant difference in attitudes between the 2nd and 5th academic years (t=5.95, P˂0.001). No significant difference in attitudes existed among the academic years on the negative subscale; the 2nd and 3rd (t=3.82, P=0.004), 4th (t=3.61, P=0.011), 5th (t=8.36, P˂0.001), and 6th (t=4.20, P=0.001) academic years showed significant differences on the positive subscale. Age showed no correlation with attitudes. There was a more favorable attitude to learning communication skills among the women participants than among the men participants (P=0.006).
Conclusion Despite positive general attitudes toward learning communication skills, the difference in attitude between the genders, academic years 2 and 5, and the subsequent classes suggest a re-evaluation of the curriculum and teaching methods to facilitate appropriate course structure according to the academic years and a learning process that addressees gender differences.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Attitudes toward learning communication skills among Iranian medical students Naser Yousefzadeh Kandevani, Ali Labaf, Azim Mirzazadeh, Pegah Salimi Pormehr BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose It aims to find students’ performance of and perspectives on an objective structured practical examination (OSPE) for assessment of laboratory and preclinical skills in biomedical laboratory science (BLS). It also aims to investigate the perception, acceptability, and usefulness of OSPE from the students’ and examiners’ point of view.
Methods This was a longitudinal study to implement an OSPE in BLS. The student group consisted of 198 BLS students enrolled in semester 4, 2015–2019 at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Sweden. Fourteen teachers evaluated the performance by completing a checklist and global rating scales. A student survey questionnaire was administered to the participants to evaluate the student perspective. To assess quality, 4 independent observers were included to monitor the examiners.
Results Almost 50% of the students passed the initial OSPE. During the repeat OSPE, 73% of the students passed the OSPE. There was a statistically significant difference between the first and the second repeat OSPE (P<0.01) but not between the first and the third attempt (P=0.09). The student survey questionnaire was completed by 99 of the 198 students (50%) and only 63 students responded to the free-text questions (32%). According to these responses, some stations were perceived as more difficult, albeit they considered the assessment to be valid. The observers found the assessment protocols and examiner’s instructions assured the objectivity of the examination.
Conclusion The introduction of an OSPE in the education of biomedical laboratory scientists was a reliable, and useful examination of practical skills.
Purpose This study aims to apply the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods to actual Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE) 2022 written examination data to estimate cut scores for the written KMLE.
Methods Fourteen panelists gathered to derive the cut score of the 86th KMLE written examination data using the yes/no Angoff method. The panel reviewed the items individually before the meeting and shared their respective understanding of the minimum-competency physician. The standard setting process was conducted in 5 rounds over a total of 800 minutes. In addition, 2 rounds of the Hofstee method were conducted before starting the standard setting process and after the second round of yes/no Angoff.
Results For yes/no Angoff, as each round progressed, the panel’s opinion gradually converged to a cut score of 198 points, and the final passing rate was 95.1%. The Hofstee cut score was 208 points out of a maximum 320 with a passing rate of 92.1% at the first round. It scored 204 points with a passing rate of 93.3% in the second round.
Conclusion The difference between the cut scores obtained through yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods did not exceed 2% points, and they were within the range of cut scores from previous studies. In both methods, the difference between the panelists decreased as rounds were repeated. Overall, our findings suggest the acceptability of cut scores and the possibility of independent use of both methods.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Issues in the 3rd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, including computer-based testing, study design, ChatGPT, journal metrics, and appreciation to reviewers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 5. CrossRef
Presidential address: improving item validity and adopting computer-based testing, clinical skills assessments, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality in health professions licensing examinations in Korea Hyunjoo Pai Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 8. CrossRef
Purpose Undertaking a standard-setting exercise is a common method for setting pass/fail cut scores for high-stakes examinations. The recently introduced equal Z standard-setting method (EZ method) has been found to be a valid and effective alternative for the commonly used Angoff and Hofstee methods and their variants. The current study aims to estimate the minimum number of panelists required for obtaining acceptable and reliable cut scores using the EZ method.
Methods The primary data were extracted from 31 panelists who used the EZ method for setting cut scores for a 12-station of medical school’s final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Taiwan. For this study, a new data set composed of 1,000 random samples of different panel sizes, ranging from 5 to 25 panelists, was established and analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to measure the differences in the cut scores set by the sampled groups, across all sizes within each station.
Results On average, a panel of 10 experts or more yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 90% and 15 experts yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 95%. No significant differences in cut scores associated with panel size were identified for panels of 5 or more experts.
Conclusion The EZ method was found to be valid and feasible. Less than an hour was required for 12 panelists to assess 12 OSCE stations. Calculating the cut scores required only basic statistical skills.
Purpose This study examined how students’ academic performance changed after undergoing a transition to online learning during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, based on the test results of 16 integrated courses conducted in 3 semesters at Hanyang University College of Medicine in Korea.
Methods For the 16 required courses that formed an integrated system-based curriculum running for 3 semesters, the major examinations’ raw scores were collected for each student. Percent-correct scores were used in the subsequent analysis. We used the t-test to compare grades between 2019 and 2020, and the Cohen D was calculated as a measure of effect size. The correlation of scores between courses was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficients.
Results There was a significant decrease in scores in 2020 for 10 courses (62.5%). While most of the integrated system-based curriculum test scores showed strong correlations, with coefficients of 0.6 or higher in both 2019 and 2020, the correlation coefficients were generally higher in 2020. When students were divided into low, middle, and high achievement groups, low-achieving students consistently showed declining test scores in all 3 semesters.
Conclusion Our findings suggest that the transition to online classes due to COVID-19 has led to an overall decline in academic performance. This overall decline, which may occur when the curriculum is centered on recorded lectures, needs to be addressed. Further, medical schools need to consider establishing a support system for the academic development of low-achieving students.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Study delay during emergency remote teaching among students at Dutch universities: the role of students’ education satisfaction and academic wellbeing Manja Vollmann, Renée A. Scheepers, Femke Hilverda European Journal of Psychology of Education.2024; 39(3): 2849. CrossRef
Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing online teaching on pre-clinical medical education Houman Goudarzi, Masahiro Onozawa, Makoto Takahashi BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Navigating the shift to online learning: student experiences of inclusivity, efficiency, and study efforts in Chile Grace Melo, Diego Monteza, Sandra Acosta Cogent Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' academic performance and mental health: An overview Shamim Al Aziz Lalin, Mufti Nadimul Quamar Ahmed, Shah Md Atiqul Haq Regional Science Policy & Practice.2024; 16(7): 100046. CrossRef
Student preferences over module design Joshua Fullard Discover Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prevalence and associated factors of ADHD-like symptoms among
pharmacy students at Prince of Songkla University, Thailand in 2024: a
cross-sectional study Krittiya Rakchat, Saranan Eadcharoen, Amarawan Pentrakan The Ewha Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The nationwide impact of COVID-19 on life support courses. A retrospective evaluation by Resuscitation Council UK C.J. Thorne, P.K. Kimani, S. Hampshire, I. Hamilton-Bower, S. Begum-Ali, A. Benson-Clarke, K. Couper, J. Yeung, A. Lockey, G.D. Perkins, J. Soar Resuscitation Plus.2023; 13: 100366. CrossRef
COVID-19 and Living Situation: Effects on University of Michigan Students During the 2020-2021 Academic Year Barbara Tan, Alyssa Cadez-Martin, Sarah Fox Fox, Samir Gadepalli University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
How successful the online assessment techniques in distance learning have been, in contributing to academic achievements of management undergraduates? Hiruni Thathsarani, Dinushika Kaushalya Ariyananda, Chalani Jayakody, Kerthiga Manoharan, A.A.S.N Munasinghe, Nilmini Rathnayake Education and Information Technologies.2023; 28(11): 14091. CrossRef
Academic performance and mental health among Chinese middle and high school students after the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions Hong-Jun Song, Yun-Fei Mu, Cong Wang, Jia Cai, Zhong-Yue Deng, Ai-Ping Deng, Xue-Hua Huang, Xian-Dong Meng, Lan Zhang, Yi Huang, Wei Zhang, Wen-Wu Shen, Jin Chen, Bo Liu, Ru Gao, Jun-Shu Zhao, Mao-Sheng Ran Frontiers in Psychiatry.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
HOW DID ONLINE LEARNING AFFECT PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC? Muhammet Fatih BULUT, Aybüke Cansu KALKAN, Arzu GENÇ, Seher ÖZYÜREK SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 30(4): 652. CrossRef
The impact of asynchronous online anatomy teaching and smaller learning groups in the anatomy laboratory on medical students’ performance during the Covid‐19 pandemic Ming‐Fong Chang, Meng‐Lin Liao, June‐Horng Lue, Chi‐Chuan Yeh Anatomical Sciences Education.2022; 15(3): 476. CrossRef
Educational impact of an active learning session with 6-lead mobile electrocardiography on medical students’ knowledge of cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a survey-based observational study Alexandra Camille Greb, Emma Altieri, Irene Masini, Emily Helena Frisch, Milton Leon Greenberg Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 12. CrossRef
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases at Universities and Colleges in Seoul Metropolitan Area Young June Choe, Yun-Kyung Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
We aimed to determine whether it was feasible to assess medical students as they completed a virtual sub-internship. Six students (out of 31 who completed an in-person sub-internship) participated in a 2-week virtual sub-internship, caring for patients remotely. Residents and attendings assessed those 6 students in 15 domains using the same assessment measures from the in-person sub-internship. Raters marked “unable to assess” in 75/390 responses (19%) for the virtual sub-internship versus 88/3,405 (2.6%) for the in-person sub-internship (P=0.01), most frequently for the virtual sub-internship in the domains of the physical examination (21, 81%), rapport with patients (18, 69%), and compassion (11, 42%). Students received complete assessments in most areas. Scores were higher for the in-person than the virtual sub-internship (4.67 vs. 4.45, P<0.01) for students who completed both. Students uniformly rated the virtual clerkship positively. Students can be assessed in many domains in the context of a virtual sub-internship.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association of Virtual Away Rotations With Residency Applicant Outcomes in Otolaryngology Nicholas R. Lenze, William J. Benjamin, Lauren A. Bohm, Marc C. Thorne, Michael J. Brenner, Angela P. Mihalic, Robbi A. Kupfer OTO Open.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
For the past 20 years, the medical education accreditation program of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) has contributed significantly to the standardization and improvement of the quality of basic medical education in Korea. It should now contribute to establishing and promoting the future of medical education. The Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 (ASK2019) have been adopted since 2019, with the goal of achieving world-class medical education by applying a learner-centered curriculum using a continuum framework for the 3 phases of formal medical education: basic medical education, postgraduate medical education, and continuing professional development. ASK2019 will also be able to promote medical education that meets community needs and employs systematic assessments throughout the education process. These are important changes that can be used to gauge the future of the medical education accreditation system. Furthermore, globalization, inter-professional education, health systems science, and regular self-assessment systems are emerging as essential topics for the future of medical education. It is time for the medical education accreditation system in Korea to observe and adopt new trends in global medical education.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Analyzing the characteristics of mission statements in Korean medical schools based on the Korean Doctor’s Role framework Ye Ji Kang, Soomin Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Do-Hwan Kim Korean Journal of Medical Education.2024; 36(1): 99. CrossRef
Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study Yoonjung Lee, Min-jung Lee, Junmoo Ahn, Chungwon Ha, Ye Ji Kang, Cheol Woong Jung, Dong-Mi Yoo, Jihye Yu, Seung-Hee Lee Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 8. CrossRef
Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
Continuing Professional Development of Pharmacists and The Roles of Pharmacy Schools Hyemin Park, Jeong-Hyun Yoon Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2022; 32(4): 281. CrossRef
Definition of character for medical education based on expert opinions in Korea Yera Hur Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 26. CrossRef
Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33. CrossRef
Purpose This study was conducted to determine whether a computer simulation of practical exercises in undergraduate medical pharmacology led to the realization of the intended learning outcomes.
Methods The study was a descriptive analysis of laboratory classes carried out using computer simulation programs. Five programs were used to teach practical pharmacology to undergraduate medical students at the Mulungushi University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. The study period was January 2018 to December 2019. The computer programs included a pharmacokinetics simulator (CyberPatient), organ bath simulator (OBSim), AutonomiCAL for simulating autonomic pharmacology, and Virtual Cat and Virtual Rat (RatCVS) for simulating cardiovascular pharmacology. Students utilized these programs during their pharmacology laboratory classes, wrote reports, and answered relevant clinical questions.
Results The 5 programs provided easy and precise platforms for students to explore concepts and demonstrate knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, autonomic and cardiovascular pharmacology, and their clinical applications.
Conclusion The programs were effective learning tools. Students’ learning was easily assessed based on their laboratory reports. Although the computer programs met medical students’ learning needs, wet laboratory exercises are also needed to meet the needs of students who require practical laboratory skills.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Quality and impact of pharmacology digital simulation education on pre-registration healthcare students: A systematic literature review Sharad Rayamajhi, Alison Machin, Cathal Breen, Gdiom Gebreheat, Ruth Paterson Nurse Education Today.2024; 140: 106295. CrossRef
Simulation as a Tool to Illustrate Clinical Pharmacology Concepts to Healthcare Program Learners Liza Barbarello Andrews, Les Barta Current Pharmacology Reports.2020; 6(4): 182. CrossRef
Purpose To evaluate ophthalmic educational training and confidence in caring for patients with ophthalmic complaints among internal, emergency, and family medicine residents in the United States.
Methods A 41-item cross-sectional survey was sent to the directors of 529 internal medicine, 237 emergency medicine, and 629 family medicine residency programs, who distributed it to residents in those programs. The survey included the number of ophthalmic education hours residents received. Respondents were asked to rate their confidence in performing an ophthalmic exam and treating patients with ocular conditions using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “not confident” to “very confident.”
Results In total, 92.5% of internal medicine, 66.8% of emergency medicine, and 74.5% of family medicine residents received less than 10 hours of ophthalmic education during residency. Most respondents (internal medicine, 59.1%; emergency medicine, 76.0%; family medicine, 65.7%) reported that patients with ocular complaints constituted 1%–5% of visits. Mean±standard deviation confidence levels in performing an eye exam and treating patients with ophthalmic conditions were highest in emergency medicine residency programs (2.9±0.7), followed by family medicine (2.3±0.6) and internal medicine (2.2±0.6). A higher reported number of ophthalmic education hours in residency was associated with greater confidence among emergency (P<0.001), family (P<0.001), and internal (P=0.005) medicine residents.
Conclusion Internal, emergency, and family medicine residents receive limited ophthalmic education, as reflected by their overall low confidence levels in performing an ophthalmic exam and treating patients with ocular complaints. An increase in ophthalmic educational hours during their residencies is recommended to improve upon this knowledge gap.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluating patient flow through an emergency ophthalmology consult service in a tertiary care academic centre in Quebec Emmanuel Issa Nassrallah, Zoya Chaudhry, Georges Nassrallah, Zainab Khan Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology.2024; 59(2): e111. CrossRef
Evaluation of a STAT MRI Protocol for Patients with Optic Disc Edema Alison B. Gibbons, Peng Huang, Matthew Sklar, Philip Kim, Amanda D. Henderson Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.2024; 44(4): 497. CrossRef
Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases Mohammad Delsoz, Yeganeh Madadi, Hina Raja, Wuqaas M. Munir, Brendan Tamm, Shiva Mehravaran, Mohammad Soleimani, Ali Djalilian, Siamak Yousefi Cornea.2024; 43(5): 664. CrossRef
Ophthalmology inpatient consultations: an Irish tertiary hospital experience Robert McGrath, Edward Ahern, Mark James, Zubair Idrees, Eamonn O’Connell Eye.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Generative adversarial network-based deep learning approach in classification of retinal conditions with optical coherence tomography images Ling-Chun Sun, Shu-I. Pao, Ke-Hao Huang, Chih-Yuan Wei, Ke-Feng Lin, Ping-Nan Chen Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.2023; 261(5): 1399. CrossRef
Competency and Level of Confidence of Emergency Residents When Dealing with Ocular Emergency Cases in Saudi Arabia Faisal Almishali, Adhwaa Allihyani, Norah Albdaya, Ghidaa Gosty, Lujain Marghlani, Mohannad Alqurashi International Medical Education.2023; 2(2): 113. CrossRef
Creating ophthalmology experiences in undergraduate medical education: pilot of a cased-based learning ophthalmology tool Jessica H. Tran, Emma Loebel, Mark Edouard, Thomas Quehl, Erin Walsh, Robin Ginsburg, Tameisha Frempong, Douglas Fredrick, Laura K. Stein, Michael G. Fara, Samira S. Farouk, Nisha Chadha BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Sebaceous Carcinoma Masquerading As Orbital Cellulitis Vignesh Ramachandran, Gayane Tumyan, Asad Loya, Kristina Treat, Ivan Vrcek Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A Third-Year Medical School Ophthalmology Curriculum for a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Model A. Itzam Marin, Helio Neves da Silva, Hongan Chen, Nihaal Mehta, Linh K. Nguyen, Jeffrey R. SooHoo, Jennifer E. Adams, Jasleen K. Singh Journal of Academic Ophthalmology.2022; 14(02): e209. CrossRef
A Porcine-Based Task Trainer for the Instruction of Seidel’s Test and Ocular Foreign Body Removal Nickolas E Srica, Ryan Walsh, Joseph Sikon, Lawrence Stack Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic Sally S.E. Park, Rohin Vij, Jeff Wu, Bryan Zarrin, Jee-Young Moon, Jason Oliveira, Jeffrey S. Schultz, Anurag Shrivastava Journal of Academic Ophthalmology.2022; 14(02): e229. CrossRef
Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants David Cui, Andreas M. Wingert, Ingrid U. Scott Journal of Academic Ophthalmology.2021; 13(02): e129. CrossRef
Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493. CrossRef
Purpose The study aimed to identify the motivational factors and demographic variables influencing the career preferences of medical students in India.
Methods We conducted a questionnaire-based survey at Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. The participants were 368 of the 460 medical students and interns enrolled at the institution from October 2015 to August 2016. We designed the questionnaire to collect demographic data, students’ preferences for career specialties, and the motivational factors influencing them. Then, we analyzed the influence of these factors and demographic variables on career preferences using regression analysis.
Results Of the 368 respondents, 356 (96.7%) expressed their intention to pursue a residency program after the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) program, and about two-thirds indicated their preference to do so in India. The specialties most preferred by students were general surgery, general medicine (internal medicine), and pediatrics, while the least preferred were anatomy, obstetrics and gynecology, and community medicine. Factor analysis yielded three motivational factors, which we named ‘personal growth,’ ‘professional growth,’ and ‘personal satisfaction’ based on the items loaded in each. The motivational factors were predicted by demographic variables (gender, geographical background, current stage in the MBBS program, and the presence of relatives in the health professions). Demographic variables and the motivational factors also had significant influences on career preferences.
Conclusion This study provides insights into the motivational factors that influence the career preferences of Indian medical students and interns. A robust longitudinal study would be required to study intra-individual variations in preferences and the persistence of choices.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Medical students’ career preferences in Bangladesh Mohammad Azmain Iktidar, Md Muid Sakib, Ummi Rukaiya Munni, Fahmida Hoque Rimti, Renessa Yousuf, Koushik Majumder, Tirtha Saha, Farhat Lamisa Golpo, Md Samee U Sayed, Sabrina Monsur, Asadul Al Galib, Md Kamran Hossain, Sigma Alam Shupti, Noshin Nawar, Sud BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors affecting the choice of medical specialties in Turkiye: an analysis based on cross-sectional survey of medical graduates Mustafa Said Yıldız, M. Mahmud Khan BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A qualitative study of career decision making among African and Asian international medical students in China: process, challenges, and strategies Wen Li, Hong Sun, Asaduzzaman Khan, Robyn Gillies Advances in Health Sciences Education.2024; 29(5): 1711. CrossRef
Specialty preferences of undergraduate medical students: What do they choose and why? Aditya Amit Godbole, Gauri A. Oka, Mrunal N. Ketkar, Rajvardhan Singh Solanki, Dhruvi T. Desai, Sejal V. Bangale, Atharva S. Rele Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Strategies to get the best undergraduate medical students in India to choose ENT as a postgraduate specialty in the NEET PG/National Exit Test Soumick Ranjan Sahoo Annals of Indian Academy of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.2024; 8(1): 24. CrossRef
Specialties preference by gender among medical students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa Andiswa Pooe, Samuel T. Ntuli, Sizwe Masango, Aqila Rab, Thiambi Mudau, Pollet M. Mantsho, Sifundo Mtshali South African Family Practice.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Motivators and Barriers to Career Choices in Community Medicine Among Medical Students in South Punjab, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey Raamish A Khan, Muneera Tariq, Ifra Sultan , Allahdad Khan, Abdul Ahad Riaz, Humna Shahzad, Muhammad Uzair, Ayesha Younus, Muhammad Zain Bin Shahid, FNU Poombal Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on specialty choice: A survey of fresh medical graduates of Pakistan Fatima Sajid, Shayan Rizwan, Muneeza Rizwan, Asad Ullah Waseem, Malik M Mufeez, Iraj Khalid Journal of Medical Education Development.2024; 17(54): 122. CrossRef
Breaking Barriers: The Case for Inclusive Leadership in Medicine Urmila Anandh, Priti Meena, Vivekanand Jha Indian Journal of Nephrology.2024; 0: 1. CrossRef
Learning approaches, motivation, and specialty preference form a nexus: a cross-sectional study among preclinical medical students S. S. Prakash, N. Muthuraman Discover Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Teaching in radiation oncology: now and 2025—results of a focus group with medical students Philipp Linde, Marie Klein, Frauke Lang, Simone Wegen, Cordula Petersen, Hendrik Dapper, Jiaqi Fan, Eren Celik, Simone Marnitz, Christian Baues Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.2023; 199(4): 360. CrossRef
Electives in Indian medical education: An opportunity to seize Medha Mathur, Navgeet Mathur, Anjana Verma, Manjinder Kaur, Ashish Patyal Adesh University Journal of Medical Sciences & Research.2023; 4: 53. CrossRef
Specialty preferences of studying-abroad medical students from low- and middle-income countries Wen Li, Robyn M. Gillies, Chang Liu, Changhao Wu, Jiayi Chen, Xiaoning Zhang, Bin Cheng, Jing Dai, Ning Fu, Lin Li, Shenjun Liu, Hong Sun BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring Specialty Selection and Influencing Factors among Medical Students and Postgraduates: An Observational Study Muhammad Maaz Arif, Wardah Nisar , Khadija Agha , Muzammil Ghaffar Qureshi, Amen Mansoor, Asad Ullah Malik, Muhammad Sohaib Khokhar, Fatima Awan, Sarah Irfan Khwaja, Aqsa Parveen Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2023; : 263. CrossRef
Perception of Oncology Evaluated by Medical Students (P.O.E.M.S)—a Single Institutional Study Pritha Roy, Abhishek Basu, Debdeep Samaddar, Hambir Chowdhury Journal of Cancer Education.2022; 37(3): 709. CrossRef
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on career intention amongst undergraduate medical students: a single-centre cross-sectional study conducted in Hubei Province Xue-lin Wang, Ming-xiu Liu, Shuai Peng, Lei Yang, Chen Lu, Shi-cong Shou, Jian-ru Wang, Jun-yi Sun, Jia-qi Wang, Yan Hu, Jun Zhao, Peng Duan BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
What do Iranian physicians value most when choosing a specialty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment Yaser Sarikhani, Sulmaz Ghahramani, Sisira Edirippulige, Yoshikazu Fujisawa, Matthew Bambling, Peivand Bastani Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Fatores contribuintes para escolha da pediatria como especialidade médica Pedro Guerra Júnior, Mônica Ramos Daltro Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Fatores contribuintes para escolha da pediatria como especialidade médica Pedro Guerra Júnior, Mônica Ramos Daltro Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Will you choose neurosurgery as your career? An Indian female medical student perspective Bhavya Pahwa, Mayank Kalyani, Ishika Jain, Suchanda Bhattacharjee Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2022; 105: 1. CrossRef
The Future of Pulmonary Medicine Physician Work-Force in India Ahmad Ozair, Surya Kant The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences.2022; 62(4): 233. CrossRef
A thematic network for factors affecting the choice of specialty education by medical students: a scoping study in low-and middle-income countries Yaser Sarikhani, Sulmaz Ghahramani, Mohsen Bayati, Farhad Lotfi, Peivand Bastani BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors and Determinants of Choosing Pathology as a Future Career: Results From a Multi-Institution Study Emad M Masuadi, Mohamud S Mohamud, Abdulrahman M Alhassan, Khalid G Alharbi, Ahmed S Hilabi, Faisal A Alharbi, Abdullah T Tatwani, Abdullah I Farraj, Sami Al-Nasser, Mohammed F Safi Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
An Online Survey on Job Satisfaction among Indian Radiologists - Under-Studied Journey from Promised Land to Paradise Lost Sudha Kiran Das, Vikram Patil, Anupama Chandrappa, Sachin Thammegowda, Sachin Prabhakar Shetty, Rudresh Hiremath Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2021; 10(42): 3633. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021 Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
Why are India’s Best Medical Graduates not Preferring ENT for Postgraduate Training Through NEET-PG? Ahmad Ozair, Abhishek Bahadur Singh Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2020; 72(4): 535. CrossRef
Determining factors for the choice of medical career among the final year medical students of a private university in Nigeria AbiodunIdowu Okunlola, OlakunleFatai Babalola, CeciliaKehinde Okunlola, AdedayoIdris Salawu, OlabisiTimothy Adeyemo, IdowuOluwaseyi Adebara Nigerian Journal of Medicine.2020; 29(2): 308. CrossRef
Factors influencing medical students’ choice of specialization: A gender based systematic review Mathieu Levaillant, Lucie Levaillant, Nicolas Lerolle, Benoît Vallet, Jean-François Hamel-Broza EClinicalMedicine.2020; 28: 100589. CrossRef
Anticipated decrease in surgeons: does orthopedic internship affect medical students career choice? İbrahim Deniz CANBEYLİ, Meriç ÇIRPAR Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine.2020; 3(4): 395. CrossRef
Improving the reliability and consistency of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) raters’ marking poses a continual challenge in medical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an e-Learning training module for OSCE raters who participated in the assessment of third-year medical students at the University of Ottawa, Canada. The effects of online training and those of traditional in-person (face-to-face) orientation were compared. Of the 90 physicians recruited as raters for this OSCE, 60 consented to participate (67.7%) in the study in March 2017. Of the 60 participants, 55 rated students during the OSCE, while the remaining 5 were back-up raters. The number of raters in the online training group was 41, while that in the traditional in-person training group was 19. Of those with prior OSCE experience (n= 18) who participated in the online group, 13 (68%) reported that they preferred this format to the in-person orientation. The total average time needed to complete the online module was 15 minutes. Furthermore, 89% of the participants felt the module provided clarity in the rater training process. There was no significant difference in the number of missing ratings based on the type of orientation that raters received. Our study indicates that online OSCE rater training is comparable to traditional face-to-face orientation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Raters and examinees training for objective structured clinical examination: comparing the effectiveness of three instructional methodologies Jefferson Garcia Guerrero, Ayidah Sanad Alqarni, Lorraine Turiano Estadilla, Lizy Sonia Benjamin, Vanitha Innocent Rani BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 11. CrossRef
Empirical analysis comparing the tele-objective structured clinical examination and the in-person assessment in Australia Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 23. CrossRef
No observed effect of a student-led mock objective structured clinical examination on subsequent performance scores in medical students in Canada Lorenzo Madrazo, Claire Bo Lee, Meghan McConnell, Karima Khamisa, Debra Pugh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 14. CrossRef
ОБ’ЄКТИВНИЙ СТРУКТУРОВАНИЙ КЛІНІЧНИЙ ІСПИТ ЯК ВИМІР ПРАКТИЧНОЇ ПІДГОТОВКИ МАЙБУТНЬОГО ЛІКАРЯ M. M. Korda, A. H. Shulhai, N. V. Pasyaka, N. V. Petrenko, N. V. Haliyash, N. A. Bilkevich Медична освіта.2019; (3): 19. CrossRef
Purpose The aim of this study was to measure the effect of an iPad-based asynchronous curriculum on emergency medicine resident performance on the in-training exam (ITE). We hypothesized that the implementation of an asynchronous curriculum (replacing 1 hour of weekly didactic time) would result in non-inferior ITE scores compared to the historical scores of residents who had participated in the traditional 5-hour weekly didactic curriculum.
Methods The study was a retrospective, non-inferiority study. conducted at the University of California, Irvine Emergency Medicine Residency Program. We compared ITE scores from 2012 and 2013, when there were 5 weekly hours of didactic content, with scores from 2014 and 2015, when 1 hour of conference was replaced with asynchro-nous content. Examination results were compared using a non-inferiority data analysis with a 10% margin of difference.
Results Using a non-inferiority test with a 95% confidence interval, there was no difference between the 2 groups (before and after implementation of asynchronous learning), as the confidence interval for the change of the ITE was −3.5 to 2.3 points, whereas the 10% non-inferiority margin was 7.8 points.
Conclusion Replacing 1 hour of didactic conference with asynchronous learning showed no negative impact on resident ITE scores.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
An Asynchronous Curriculum: Learner Perspectives on Incorporating Asynchronous Learning Into In-Person and Virtual Emergency Residency Didactics Emily L Jameyfield, Semhar Tesfai, Alejandro A Palma, Adriana S Olson Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of the Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self‐Instruction System (PedOASIS) tool on pediatric hematology/oncology trainee education Rebecca E. MacDonell‐Yilmaz, Anarina Murillo, Jennifer G. Welch Pediatric Blood & Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and Validation of Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self-Instruction System (PedOASIS): An Opioid Knowledge Tool for Pediatric Clinicians Rebecca E. MacDonell-Yilmaz, Angela Anderson, Priya Hirway, Jennifer G. Welch Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2022; 44(1): e204. CrossRef
Utilizing social media for cardiovascular education Christina Mansour, Nooshin Beygui, Mamas A Mamas, Purvi J Parwani Heart.2022; 108(15): 1240. CrossRef
Nephrology Trainee Education Needs Assessment: Five Years and a Pandemic Later Benjamin S. Ko, Kurtis A. Pivert, Rob Rope, Anna M. Burgner, Joshua S. Waitzman, Susan M. Halbach, Suzanne M. Boyle, Lili Chan, Stephen M. Sozio Kidney Medicine.2022; 4(11): 100548. CrossRef
Planning Engaging, Remote, Synchronous Didactics in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era Ronald Rivera, Jonathan Smart, Sangeeta Sakaria, Alisa Wray, Warren Wiechmann, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey JMIR Medical Education.2021; 7(2): e25213. CrossRef
Pediatric Resident Engagement With an Online Critical Care Curriculum During the Intensive Care Rotation* Dennis A. Daniel, Sue E. Poynter, Christopher P. Landrigan, Charles A. Czeisler, Jeffrey P. Burns, Traci A. Wolbrink Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.2020; 21(11): 986. CrossRef
Asynchronous Curriculum “Socially Synchronized”: Learning Via Competition Jon Smart, Adriana Segura Olson, Andrew Muck Western Journal of Emergency Medicine.2018; 20(1): 6. CrossRef
Purpose Acceptance of a learning technology affects students’ intention to use that technology, but the influence of the acceptance of a learning technology on learning approaches has not been investigated in the literature. A deep learning approach is important in the field of health, where links must be created between skills, knowledge, and habits. Our hypothesis was that acceptance of a hybrid learning model would affect students’ way of learning.
Methods We analysed these concepts, and their correlations, in the context of a flipped classroom method using a local learning management system. In a sample of all students within a single year of study in the midwifery program (n= 38), we used 3 validated scales to evaluate these concepts (the Study Process Questionnaire, My Intellectual Work Tools, and the Hybrid E-Learning Acceptance Model: Learner Perceptions).
Results Our sample had a positive acceptance of the learning model, but a neutral intention to use it. Students reported that they were distractible during distance learning. They presented a better mean score for the deep approach than for the superficial approach (P< 0.001), which is consistent with their declared learning strategies (personal reorganization of information; search and use of examples). There was no correlation between poor acceptance of the learning model and inadequate learning approaches. The strategy of using deep learning techniques was moderately correlated with acceptance of the learning model (rs= 0.42, P= 0.03).
Conclusion Learning approaches were not affected by acceptance of a hybrid learning model, due to the flexibility of the tool. However, we identified problems in the students’ time utilization, which explains their neutral intention to use the system.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Learning approaches, motivation, and specialty preference form a nexus: a cross-sectional study among preclinical medical students S. S. Prakash, N. Muthuraman Discover Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Addressing Individual Perception: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to the Interim Payment Method in Construction Projects Lei Zhu, Hui Xiong, Yan Ning, Miaomiao Lv Sustainability.2023; 15(9): 7120. CrossRef
Online learning and teaching approaches used in midwifery programs: A scoping review Terri Downer, Michelle Gray, Tanya Capper Nurse Education Today.2021; 103: 104980. CrossRef
Investigating the Flipped Classroom Model in a High School Writing Course: Action Research to Impact Student Writing Achievement and Engagement Elizabeth Ann Florence, Tammi Kolski TechTrends.2021; 65(6): 1042. CrossRef
User-centered evaluation of Discord in midwifery education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the adaptation of the tool to student needs Lionel Di Marco European Journal of Midwifery.2021; 5(November): 1. CrossRef
Utilization of Nursing Defect Management Evaluation and Deep Learning in Nursing Process Reengineering Optimization Yue Liu, Huaping Liu, Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Utilisation d’outils numériques dans le cadre d’un dispositif hybride pour l’apprentissage par problème de la physiologie en deuxième année des études médicales. Étude de faisabilité du recours au laboratoire numérique de physiologie « e-ϕsioLab ». Fares Gouzi, François Bughin, Lucie Barateau, Agathe Hubert, Savine Volland, Dalila Laoudj-Chenivesse, Emilie Passerieux, Régis Lopez, Antonia Perez-Martin, Iris Schuster-Beck, Stephan Matecki, Michel Dauzat, Yves Dauvilliers, Maurice Hayot, Jacques Merci Pédagogie Médicale.2018; 19(2): 77. CrossRef
Purpose College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, United Arab Emirates, underwent a major curriculum change from a discipline-based to an organ system-based integrated curriculum. However, it was not known how the faculty perceived the changes in the educational environment as experienced by the students. In this context, we aimed to compare the faculty perceptions of the student experiences in the discipline-based curriculum with those in the organ system-based integrated curriculum.
Methods The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire was modified to assess faculty perceptions of the student experiences, pilot-tested, and administered to all faculty members (n=28) involved in the discipline-based curriculum (FDC) in January 2009. In the subsequent year, data were collected from the same faculty involved in the new integrated curriculum (FIC). Collected data were transferred to Predictive Analytics Software version 18. Total, domain, and individual statement scores were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Percentage agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty were assessed by the McNemar’s test for proportion.
Results The mean total DREEM score was significantly higher (P<0.001) for FIC (139/200) as compared to FDC (119/200). The FIC perceived significantly more positive student experiences with the educational environment as indicated by the domain scores and statement scores. The differences in proportions of agreement between FIC and FDC also reinforced that the FIC perceived more positive student experiences with the educational environment.
Conclusion The study showed that the faculty perceived the organ system-based integrated curriculum as providing a better educational environment for the students than the discipline based curriculum.