Analyzing the relationship between psychometric indices of item analysis with attainment of course learning outcomes: cross-sectional study in integrated outcome-based dental curriculum courses Kiran Kumar Ganji, Nilakantan Ananthakrishnan, Shivasakthy Manivasakan, Mohammed Katib Alruwaili, Meshal Aber Alonazi, Hmoud Ali Algarni BMC Medical Education.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose This study presents item analysis results of the 26 health personnel licensing examinations managed by the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute (KHPLEI) in 2022.
Methods The item difficulty index, item discrimination index, and reliability were calculated. The item discrimination index was calculated using a discrimination index based on the upper and lower 27% rule and the item-total correlation.
Results Out of 468,352 total examinees, 418,887 (89.4%) passed. The pass rates ranged from 27.3% for health educators level 1 to 97.1% for oriental medical doctors. Most examinations had a high average difficulty index, albeit to varying degrees, ranging from 61.3% for prosthetists and orthotists to 83.9% for care workers. The average discrimination index based on the upper and lower 27% rule ranged from 0.17 for oriental medical doctors to 0.38 for radiological technologists. The average item-total correlation ranged from 0.20 for oriental medical doctors to 0.38 for radiological technologists. The Cronbach α, as a measure of reliability, ranged from 0.872 for health educators-level 3 to 0.978 for medical technologists. The correlation coefficient between the average difficulty index and average discrimination index was -0.2452 (P=0.1557), that between the average difficulty index and the average item-total correlation was 0.3502 (P=0.0392), and that between the average discrimination index and the average item-total correlation was 0.7944 (P<0.0001).
Conclusion This technical report presents the item analysis results and reliability of the recent examinations by the KHPLEI, demonstrating an acceptable range of difficulty index and discrimination index values, as well as good reliability.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The impact of traditional versus hotspot‐driven anatomy practical assessment on student cognitive processes Shanna Williams, Helen Kaiser, Sarah Feingold Anatomical Sciences Education.2025; 18(9): 985. CrossRef
Comparison of AI-generated and clinician-designed multiple-choice questions in emergency medicine exam: a psychometric analysis Murtaza Kaya, Ertan Sonmez, Ali Halici, Harun Yildirim, Abdil Coskun BMC Medical Education.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Measuring Children’s Knowledge of Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Development and Validation of RHD Knowledge Scale in Nepal Sandeepa Karki, Shishir Paudel, Rudra Prakash Hada, Prashant Khadka, Ganesh Shetty, Dhurba Khatri, Yamuna Chhetri, Sakar Khanal, Bhagawan Koirala INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef