Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Jinha Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Research article
Special article on the 20th anniversary of the journal
Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study  
Dong Gi Seo, Jeongwook Choi, Jinha Kim
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:18.   Published online July 9, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.18
  • 4,752 View
  • 386 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) under 2 stopping rules (standard error of measurement [SEM]=0.3 and 0.25) using both real and simulated data in medical examinations in Korea.
Methods
This study employed post-hoc simulation and real data analysis to explore the optimal stopping rule for CAT in medical examinations. The real data were obtained from the responses of 3rd-year medical students during examinations in 2020 at Hallym University College of Medicine. Simulated data were generated using estimated parameters from a real item bank in R. Outcome variables included the number of examinees’ passing or failing with SEM values of 0.25 and 0.30, the number of items administered, and the correlation. The consistency of real CAT result was evaluated by examining consistency of pass or fail based on a cut score of 0.0. The efficiency of all CAT designs was assessed by comparing the average number of items administered under both stopping rules.
Results
Both SEM 0.25 and SEM 0.30 provided a good balance between accuracy and efficiency in CAT. The real data showed minimal differences in pass/fail outcomes between the 2 SEM conditions, with a high correlation (r=0.99) between ability estimates. The simulation results confirmed these findings, indicating similar average item numbers between real and simulated data.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that both SEM 0.25 and 0.30 are effective termination criteria in the context of the Rasch model, balancing accuracy and efficiency in CAT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • AI-enhanced adaptive testing with cognitive diagnostic feedback and its association with performance in undergraduate surgical education: a pilot study
    Nuno Silva Gonçalves, Carlos Collares, José Miguel Pêgo
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of applying computerized adaptive testing to the Clinical Medical Science Comprehensive Examination in Korea: a psychometric study
    Jeongwook Choi, Sung-Soo Jung, Eun Kwang Choi, Kyung Sik Kim, Dong Gi Seo
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2025; 22: 29.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
TOP