The accreditation process is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools in Korea. The line that separates the two is based on how medical schools recognize and utilize the accreditation process. In other words, accreditation is a burden for medical schools if they view the accreditation process as merely a formal procedure or a means to maintain accreditation status for medical education. However, if medical schools acknowledge the positive value of the accreditation process, accreditation can be both an opportunity and a tool for developing medical education. The accreditation process has educational value by catalyzing improvements in the quality, equity, and efficiency of medical education and by increasing the available options. For the accreditation process to contribute to medical education development, accrediting agencies and medical schools must first be recognized as partners of an educational alliance working together towards common goals. Secondly, clear guidelines on accreditation standards should be periodically reviewed and shared. Finally, a formative self-evaluation process must be introduced for institutions to utilize the accreditation process as an opportunity to develop medical education. This evaluation system could be developed through collaboration among medical schools, academic societies for medical education, and the accrediting authority.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Equity in Basic Medical Education accreditation standards: a scoping review protocol Neelofar Shaheen, Usman Mahboob, Ahsan Sethi, Muhammad Irfan BMJ Open.2025; 15(1): e086661. CrossRef
To prove or improve? Examining how paradoxical tensions shape evaluation practices in accreditation contexts Betty Onyura, Abigail J. Fisher, Qian Wu, Shrutikaa Rajkumar, Sarick Chapagain, Judith Nassuna, David Rojas, Latika Nirula Medical Education.2024; 58(3): 354. CrossRef
ASPIRE for excellence in curriculum development John Jenkins, Sharon Peters, Peter McCrorie Medical Teacher.2024; 46(5): 633. CrossRef
Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study Yoonjung Lee, Min-jung Lee, Junmoo Ahn, Chungwon Ha, Ye Ji Kang, Cheol Woong Jung, Dong-Mi Yoo, Jihye Yu, Seung-Hee Lee Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 8. CrossRef
Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1. CrossRef
The Need for the Standards for Anatomy Labs in Medical School Evaluation and Accreditation Yu-Ran Heo, Jae-Ho Lee Anatomy & Biological Anthropology.2023; 36(3): 81. CrossRef
Seal of Approval or Ticket to Triumph? The Impact of Accreditation on Medical Student Performance in Foreign Medical Council Examinations Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih, Kresna Lintang Pratidina Indian Journal of Medical Specialities.2023; 14(4): 249. CrossRef
Internal evaluation in the faculties affiliated to zanjan university of medical sciences: Quality assurance of medical science education based on institutional accreditation Alireza Abdanipour, Farhad RamezaniāBadr, Ali Norouzi, Mehdi Ghaemi Journal of Medical Education Development.2022; 15(46): 61. CrossRef
Development of Mission and Vision of College of Korean Medicine Using the Delphi Techniques and Big-Data Analysis Sanghee Yeo, Seong Hun Choi, Su Jin Chae Journal of Korean Medicine.2021; 42(4): 176. CrossRef
Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33. CrossRef