Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Article category

Page Path
HOME > Article category > Article category
499 Article category
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Brief Report
Clinical performance of medical students in Korea in a whole-task emergency station in the objective structured clinical examination with a standardized patient complaining of palpitations  
Song Yi Park, Hyun-Hee Kong, Min-Jeong Kim, Yoo Sang Yoon, Sang-Hwa Lee, Sunju Im, Ji-Hyun Seo
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:42.   Published online December 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.42
  • 4,546 View
  • 132 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
This study assessed the clinical performance of 150 third-year medicalstudents in Busan, Korea in a whole-task emergency objective structured clinical examination station that simulated a patient with palpitations visiting the emergency department. The examination was conducted from November 25 to 27, 2019. Clinical performance was assessed as the number and percentage of students who performed history-taking (HT), a physical examination (PE), an electrocardiography (ECG) study, patient education (Ed), and clinical reasoning (CR), which were items on the checklist. It was found that 18.0% of students checked the patient’s pulse, 51.3% completed an ECG study, and 57.9% explained the results to the patient. A sizable proportion (38.0%) of students did not even attempt an ECG study. In a whole-task emergency station, students showed good performance on HT and CR, but unsatisfactory results for PE, ECG study, and Ed. Clinical skills educational programs for subjected student should focus more on PE, timely diagnostic tests, and sufficient Ed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Newly appointed medical faculty members’ self-evaluation of their educational roles at the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine in 2020 and 2021: a cross-sectional survey-based study
    Sun Kim, A Ra Cho, Chul Woon Chung
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 28.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea
    Song Yi Park, Sang-Hwa Lee, Min-Jeong Kim, Ki-Hwan Ji, Ji Ho Ryu
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 25.     CrossRef
Research articles
Development and validation of a measurement scale to assess nursing students’ readiness for the flipped classroom in Sri Lanka  
Punithalingam Youhasan, Yan Chen, Mataroria Lyndon, Marcus Alexander Henning
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:41.   Published online December 14, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.41
  • 6,243 View
  • 252 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scale to measure nursing students’ readiness for the flipped classroom in Sri Lanka.
Methods
A literature review provided the theoretical framework for developing the Nursing Students’ Readiness for Flipped Classroom (NSR-FC) questionnaire. Five content experts evaluated the NSR-FC, and content validity indices (CVI) were calculated. Cross-sectional surveys among 355 undergraduate nursing students from 3 state universities in Sri Lanka were carried out to assess the psychometric properties of the NSR-FC. Principal component analysis (PCA, n=265), internal consistency (using the Cronbach α coefficient, n=265), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, n=90) were done to test construct validity and reliability.
Results
Thirty-seven items were included in the NSR-FC for content validation, resulting in an average scale CVI of 0.94. Two items received item level CVI of less than 0.78. The factor structures of the 35 items were explored through PCA with orthogonal factor rotation, culminating in the identification of 5 factors. These factors were classified as technological readiness, environmental readiness, personal readiness, pedagogical readiness, and interpersonal readiness. The NSR-FC also showed an overall acceptable level of internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.9). CFA verified a 4-factor model (excluding the interpersonal readiness factor) and 20 items that achieved acceptable fit (standardized root mean square residual=0.08, root mean square error of approximation=0.08, comparative fit index=0.87, and χ2/degrees of freedom=1.57).
Conclusion
The NSR-FC, as a 4-factor model, is an acceptable measurement scale for assessing nursing students’ readiness for the flipped classroom in terms of its construct validity and reliability.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Content validity of the Constructivist Learning in Higher Education Settings (CLHES) scale in the context of the flipped classroom in higher education
    Turki Mesfer Alqahtani, Farrah Dina Yusop, Siti Hajar Halili
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The intensivist's assessment of gastrointestinal function: A pilot study
    Varsha M. Asrani, Colin McArthur, Ian Bissett, John A. Windsor
    Australian Critical Care.2022; 35(6): 636.     CrossRef
  • Psychometric evidence of a perception scale about covid-19 vaccination process in Peruvian dentists: a preliminary validation
    César F. Cayo-Rojas, Nancy Córdova-Limaylla, Gissela Briceño-Vergel, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, Hernán Cachay-Criado, Carlos López-Gurreonero, Alberto Cornejo-Pinto, Luis Cervantes-Ganoza
    BMC Health Services Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Implementation of a Web-Based Educational Intervention for Promoting Flipped Classroom Pedagogy: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Punithalingam Youhasan, Mataroria P. Lyndon, Yan Chen, Marcus A. Henning
    Medical Science Educator.2022; 33(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Assess the feasibility of flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate nursing education in Sri Lanka: A mixed-methods study
    Punithalingam Youhasan, Yan Chen, Mataroria Lyndon, Marcus A. Henning, Gwo-Jen Hwang
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(11): e0259003.     CrossRef
  • Newly appointed medical faculty members’ self-evaluation of their educational roles at the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine in 2020 and 2021: a cross-sectional survey-based study
    Sun Kim, A Ra Cho, Chul Woon Chung
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 28.     CrossRef
Increased competency of registered dietitian nutritionists in physical examination skills after simulation-based education in the United States  
Elizabeth MacQuillan, Jennifer Ford, Kristin Baird
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:40.   Published online December 14, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.40
  • 4,392 View
  • 144 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to translate simulation-based dietitian nutritionist education to clinical competency attainment in a group of practicing registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). Using a standardized instrument to measure performance on a newly-required clinical skill, the nutrition-focused physical exam (NFPE), competence was measured both before and after a simulation-based education (SBE) session.
Methods
Eighteen practicing RDNs were recruited by their employer, Spectrum Health. Following a pre-briefing session, participants completed an initial 10-minute encounter, performing NFPE on a standardized patient (SP). Next, participants completed a 90-minute SBE training session on skills within the NFPE, including hands-on practice and role play, followed by a post-training SP encounter. Video recordings of the SP encounters were scored to assess competence in 7 skill areas within the NFPE. Scores were analyzed for participants’ initial competence and change in competence.
Results
The proportions of participants with initial competence ranged from 0% to 44% across the 7 skill areas assessed. The only competency where participants initially scored in the “meets expectations” range was “approach to the patient.” When raw competence scores were assessed for changes from pre- to post-SBE training, the paired t-test indicated significant increases in all 7 competency areas following the simulation-based training (P<0.001).
Conclusion
This study showed the effectiveness of a SBE training program for increasing competence scores of practicing RDNs on a defined clinical skill.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Barriers for Liver Transplant in Patients with Alcohol-Related Hepatitis
    Gina Choi, Jihane N. Benhammou, Jung J. Yum, Elena G. Saab, Ankur P. Patel, Andrew J. Baird, Stephanie Aguirre, Douglas G. Farmer, Sammy Saab
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.2022; 12(1): 13.     CrossRef
Development and validation of a portfolio assessment system for medical schools in Korea  
Dong Mi Yoo, A Ra Cho, Sun Kim
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:39.   Published online December 9, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.39
  • 4,715 View
  • 207 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Consistent evaluation procedures based on objective and rational standards are essential for the sustainability of portfolio-based education, which has been widely introduced in medical education. We aimed to develop and implement a portfolio assessment system, and to assess its validity and reliability.
Methods
We developed a portfolio assessment system from March 2019 to August 2019 and confirmed its content validity through expert assessment by an expert group comprising 2 medical education specialists, 2 professors involved in education at medical school, and a professor of basic medical science. Six trained assessors conducted 2 rounds of evaluation of 7 randomly selected portfolios for the “Self-Development and Portfolio II” course from January 2020 to July 2020. These data are used inter-rater reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) in September 2020.
Results
The portfolio assessment system is based on the following process; assessor selection, training, analytical/comprehensive evaluation, and consensus. Appropriately trained assessors evaluated portfolios based on specific assessment criteria and a rubric for assigning points. In the analysis of inter-rater reliability, the first round of evaluation grades was submitted, and all assessment areas except “goal-setting” showed a high ICC of 0.81 or higher. After the first round of assessment, we attempted to standardize objective assessment procedures. As a result, all components of the assessments showed close correlations, with ICCs of 0.81 or higher.
Conclusion
We confirmed that when assessors with an appropriate training conduct portfolio assessment based on specified standards through a systematic procedure, the results are reliable.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development of an electronic learning progression dashboard to monitor student clinical experiences
    Hollis Lai, Nazila Ameli, Steven Patterson, Anthea Senior, Doris Lunardon
    Journal of Dental Education.2022; 86(6): 759.     CrossRef
  • Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Rei Tan, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Daniel Zhihao Hong, Annabelle Jia Sing Lim, Yun Ting Ong, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Laura Hui Shuen Tan, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Limin Wijaya, Warren Fong, Lalit Kumar Radha K
    Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development.2022; 9: 238212052210760.     CrossRef
  • Development of Teaching and Learning Manual for Competency-Based Practice for Meridian & Acupuncture Points Class
    Eunbyul Cho, Jiseong Hong, Yeonkyeong Nam, Haegue Shin, Jae-Hyo Kim
    Korean Journal of Acupuncture.2022; 39(4): 184.     CrossRef
Differences in nurses’ perceptions of self-reported pain and the administered morphine dose according to the patient’s facial expression in Korea  
Jeong Yun Park, Da In Lee
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:38.   Published online December 1, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.38
  • 4,318 View
  • 156 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to compare nurses’ perceptions of self-reported pain, the recorded pain score, and pain treatment according to the patient’s facial expression.
Methods
In this descriptive cross-sectional survey, the participants were 472 nurses working at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. A self-report questionnaire presented nurses with a smiling patient complaining of acute post-surgical pain and a grimacing patient with cancer pain, both of whom reported a pain level of 8 out of 10, and asked nurses to indicate their perception of the pain intensity, the pain score that they would record, and the medication that they would provide for each patient.
Results
The pain intensity perceived by nurses for the grimacing patient was significantly higher than that for the smiling patient (P<0.001). The recorded pain score was likewise significantly higher for the grimacing patient than for the smiling patient (P<0.001). There was a significant difference in the amount of morphine chosen by the nurses for pain interventions between the smiling and grimacing patients (P=0.040). Higher perceived pain intensity and score were associated with higher administered doses of morphine.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that nurses might be affected by patients’ facial expressions when treating pain. A pain management program should be developed that trains nurses to accurately recognize pain hidden in patients’ faces and provides them with the knowledge of how to appropriately assess and manage patients’ pain.
Female medical and nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills regarding breast self-examination in Oman: a comparison between pre- and post-training  
Rajani Ranganath, John Muthusami, Miriam Simon, Tatiyana Mandal, Meena Anand Kukkamulla
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:37.   Published online December 1, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.37
  • 5,567 View
  • 262 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. Educational and awareness programs impact early practices of breast self-examination, resulting in the early detection of cancer and thereby decreasing mortality. The study aimed to assess the levels of knowledge and awareness of breast cancer and breast self-examination among medical and nursing students in Oman and to compare their knowledge, attitudes, and skills after a training program.
Methods
This quasi-experimental study was carried out for female 90 medical and 80 nursing students in Oman in November 2019. A pre-test questionnaire was given before the training program and a post-test questionnaire was administered after the training program. Students’ knowledge, attitude, and skills regarding breast cancer and breast self-examination were compared. Scores for skills of practicing breast self-examination were compared between lecture and activity group and lecture-only group.
Results
Pre-test and post-test data were collected from 170 female students. Significant improvements were observed in the post-test scores for students’ knowledge, attitude, and skills after the intervention (P<0.001). The mean scores for skills of practicing breast self-examination after the lecture and the activity were higher than those obtained after the lecture only (P=0.014 for medical students and P=0.016 for nursing students).
Conclusion
An educational training program on breast cancer and breast examination with an emphasis on skills can motivate participants to perform breast self-examination regularly, and may therefore help students to train other women to perform breast self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nursing Students’ Motivation, Awareness, and Knowledge of Women’s Health: A Norwegian Quasi-Experimental Study
    Christine Tørris
    Education Sciences.2024; 14(3): 273.     CrossRef
  • Kavram Haritası ile Verilen Kendi Kendine Meme Muayenesi Eğitiminin Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Sağlık İnançları ve Öz Yeterlilik Düzeylerine Etkisi
    Aysun ACUN, Yadigar ORDU
    Black Sea Journal of Health Science.2023; 6(4): 632.     CrossRef
Key competencies for Korean nurses in prenatal genetic nursing: experiential genetic nursing knowledge, and ethics and law  
Gyeyoung Shin, Myunghee Jun, Hye-Kyung Kim, Michael Wreen, Sylvia Mimi Kubsch
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:36.   Published online November 26, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.36
  • 4,614 View
  • 154 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aims at determining the competencies of Korean nurses in prenatal genetic nursing.
Methods
First, a 3-round Delphi survey was conducted to establish prenatal genetic nursing competencies. Second, a prenatal genetic nursing education program (PGNEP), incorporating the findings from the Delphi survey, was designed. Third, a single group pre- and post-quasi-experimental study at a PGNEP workshop was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the integration of the competencies into the PGNEP with the measurements of knowledge about prenatal genetic testing and nursing (K-PGTN) and information needs about prenatal genetic testing and nursing (I-PGTN). Finally, the identified competencies were reexamined for their clarity.
Results
Based on the Delphi survey 78 competency components were identified. The components were then classified under 10 categories, which were organized under 4 domains. The domain of “experiential genetic nursing knowledge” and the domain of “ethics and law” were ranked as the first and the second in significance. The quasi-experimental study showed that the mean scores in K-PGTN were significantly increased from 8.19±2.67 to 11.25±2.51 (P<0.001). The mean scores of “ethics and law” in I-PGTN decreased significantly (P=0.023). The headings of 4 categories and 2 domains were revised.
Conclusion
This study identified competencies for prenatal genetic nursing and nursing education in Korea. There is a need for nursing instructors and researchers to improve the competencies of nurses in the identified areas. Particular emphasis should be placed on experiential nursing knowledge and on ethics and law related to prenatal genetic nursing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012–2022)
    Joanne Thomas, Jordan Keels, Kathleen A. Calzone, Laurie Badzek, Sarah Dewell, Christine Patch, Emma T. Tonkin, Andrew A. Dwyer
    Genes.2023; 14(11): 2013.     CrossRef
Estimation of item parameters and examinees’ mastery probability in each domain of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination using a deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) model  
Younyoung Choi, Dong Gi Seo
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:35.   Published online November 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.35
  • 4,770 View
  • 97 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) model is a promising statistical method for providing useful diagnostic information about students’ level of achievement, as educators often want to receive diagnostic information on how examinees did on each content strand, which is referred to as a diagnostic profile. The purpose of this paper was to classify examinees of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE) in different content domains using the DINA model.
Methods
This paper analyzed data from the KMLE, with 360 items and 3,259 examinees. An application study was conducted to estimate examinees’ parameters and item characteristics. The guessing and slipping parameters of each item were estimated, and statistical analysis was conducted using the DINA model.
Results
The output table shows examples of some items that can be used to check item quality. The probabilities of mastery of each content domain were also estimated, indicating the mastery profile of each examinee. The classification accuracy and consistency for 8 content domains ranged from 0.849 to 0.972 and from 0.839 to 0.994, respectively. As a result, the classification reliability of the cognitive diagnosis model was very high for the 8 content domains of the KMLE.
Conclusion
This mastery profile can provide useful diagnostic information for each examinee in terms of each content domain of the KMLE. Individual mastery profiles allow educators and examinees to understand which domain(s) should be improved in order to master all domains in the KMLE. In addition, all items showed reasonable results in terms of item parameters.
Level of professional ethics awareness and medical ethics competency of dental hygienists and dental hygiene students: the need to add ethics items to the Korean Dental Hygienist Licensing Examination  
Yoon-Sook Hwang, Jong-Hwa Jang, Kyung-Hee Kang, Minji Kim, Jeong-Ran Park, Sohyun Son, Sun-Mi Lee, Da-Yee Jeung, Jung-Eun Ha, Su-Min Hong, Young-Eun Jang
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:34.   Published online November 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.34
  • 5,391 View
  • 149 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the level of professional ethics awareness and medical ethics competency in order to assess the potential need for ethics items to be included on the Korean Dental Hygienist Licensing Examination.
Methods
In total, 358 clinical dental hygienists and dental hygiene students completed a structured questionnaire to evaluate their level of ethical awareness and medical ethics competency. The sub-factors of medical ethics were classified into relationships with patients, medical and social relations, and individual specialized fields.
Results
Only 32.1% of participants indicated that they had taken a course on professional ethics in the university curriculum, but 95.2% of respondents considered professional ethics to be important. The overall score for medical ethics competency was average (3.37 out of 5). The score for relationships with patients was 3.75 points, followed by medical and social relations (3.19 points) and individual specialized fields (3.16 points). The level of professional ethics awareness was higher among participants who had taken a course on professional ethics than among those who had not done so or who did not remember whether they had done so.
Conclusion
Dental hygienists were aware of the importance of professional ethics, but their medical ethics competency was moderate. Therefore, medical ethics should be treated as a required subject in the university curriculum, and medical ethics competency evaluations should be strengthened by adding ethics items to the Korean Dental Hygienist Licensing Examination.
Editorial
Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal
Sun Huh
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:33.   Published online October 22, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.33
  • 4,605 View
  • 94 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
PDFSupplementary Material

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Presidential address: Quarantine guidelines to protect examinees from coronavirus disease 2019, clinical skills examination for dental licensing, and computer-based testing for medical, dental, and oriental medicine licensing
    Yoon-Seong Lee
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 1.     CrossRef
  • Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation Presidential Address: the role of KIMEE as a medical education accreditation agency during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
    Young Chang Kim
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 2.     CrossRef
Reviews
A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation in Korea  
Ki-Young Lim
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:32.   Published online October 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.32
  • 4,511 View
  • 122 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
For the past 20 years, the medical education accreditation program of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) has contributed significantly to the standardization and improvement of the quality of basic medical education in Korea. It should now contribute to establishing and promoting the future of medical education. The Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 (ASK2019) have been adopted since 2019, with the goal of achieving world-class medical education by applying a learner-centered curriculum using a continuum framework for the 3 phases of formal medical education: basic medical education, postgraduate medical education, and continuing professional development. ASK2019 will also be able to promote medical education that meets community needs and employs systematic assessments throughout the education process. These are important changes that can be used to gauge the future of the medical education accreditation system. Furthermore, globalization, inter-professional education, health systems science, and regular self-assessment systems are emerging as essential topics for the future of medical education. It is time for the medical education accreditation system in Korea to observe and adopt new trends in global medical education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Analyzing the characteristics of mission statements in Korean medical schools based on the Korean Doctor’s Role framework
    Ye Ji Kang, Soomin Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Do-Hwan Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2024; 36(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
    Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Continuing Professional Development of Pharmacists and The Roles of Pharmacy Schools
    Hyemin Park, Jeong-Hyun Yoon
    Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2022; 32(4): 281.     CrossRef
  • Definition of character for medical education based on expert opinions in Korea
    Yera Hur
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 26.     CrossRef
  • Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33.     CrossRef
Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?  
Hanna Jung, Woo Taek Jeon, Shinki An
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:31.   Published online October 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.31
  • 4,921 View
  • 126 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
The accreditation process is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools in Korea. The line that separates the two is based on how medical schools recognize and utilize the accreditation process. In other words, accreditation is a burden for medical schools if they view the accreditation process as merely a formal procedure or a means to maintain accreditation status for medical education. However, if medical schools acknowledge the positive value of the accreditation process, accreditation can be both an opportunity and a tool for developing medical education. The accreditation process has educational value by catalyzing improvements in the quality, equity, and efficiency of medical education and by increasing the available options. For the accreditation process to contribute to medical education development, accrediting agencies and medical schools must first be recognized as partners of an educational alliance working together towards common goals. Secondly, clear guidelines on accreditation standards should be periodically reviewed and shared. Finally, a formative self-evaluation process must be introduced for institutions to utilize the accreditation process as an opportunity to develop medical education. This evaluation system could be developed through collaboration among medical schools, academic societies for medical education, and the accrediting authority.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • To prove or improve? Examining how paradoxical tensions shape evaluation practices in accreditation contexts
    Betty Onyura, Abigail J. Fisher, Qian Wu, Shrutikaa Rajkumar, Sarick Chapagain, Judith Nassuna, David Rojas, Latika Nirula
    Medical Education.2024; 58(3): 354.     CrossRef
  • ASPIRE for excellence in curriculum development
    John Jenkins, Sharon Peters, Peter McCrorie
    Medical Teacher.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
    Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The Need for the Standards for Anatomy Labs in Medical School Evaluation and Accreditation
    Yu-Ran Heo, Jae-Ho Lee
    Anatomy & Biological Anthropology.2023; 36(3): 81.     CrossRef
  • Seal of Approval or Ticket to Triumph? The Impact of Accreditation on Medical Student Performance in Foreign Medical Council Examinations
    Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih, Kresna Lintang Pratidina
    Indian Journal of Medical Specialities.2023; 14(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Internal evaluation in the faculties affiliated to zanjan university of medical sciences: Quality assurance of medical science education based on institutional accreditation
    Alireza Abdanipour, Farhad Ramezani‐Badr, Ali Norouzi, Mehdi Ghaemi
    Journal of Medical Education Development.2022; 15(46): 61.     CrossRef
  • Development of Mission and Vision of College of Korean Medicine Using the Delphi Techniques and Big-Data Analysis
    Sanghee Yeo, Seong Hun Choi, Su Jin Chae
    Journal of Korean Medicine.2021; 42(4): 176.     CrossRef
  • Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33.     CrossRef
Current trend of accreditation within medical education  
Ducksun Ahn
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:30.   Published online October 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30
  • 5,331 View
  • 163 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME also actively spearheaded a project to recognize accrediting agencies within individual countries. The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME), with the 2 key concepts of entrusted professional activity and milestones, has enabled researchers to identify the relationships between patient outcomes and medical education. The recent data-driven approach to CBME has been used for ongoing quality improvement of trainees and training programs. The accreditation goal has shifted from the single purpose of quality assurance to balancing quality assurance and quality improvement. Although there are many types of postgraduate medical education (PGME), it may be possible to accredit resident programs on a global scale by adopting the concept of CBME. It will also be possible to achieve accreditation alignment for BME and PGME, which center on competency. This approach may also make it possible to measure accreditation outcomes against patient outcomes. Therefore, evidence of the advantages of costly and labor-consuming accreditation processes will be available soon, and quality improvement will be the driving force of the accreditation process.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development, implementation, and evaluation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical radiation technologists in Taiwan: a nationwide experience
    Chun-Yuan Tu, Kuo-Ming Huang, Ching-Hsueh Cheng, Wei-Jou Lin, Cheng-Heng Liu, Chih-Wei Yang
    BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Navigating competency-based medical education in ophthalmology: Addressing challenges and charting future trajectories
    Rahul Singh, Disha Chaudhary, Brijesh Kr Kushwaha, Rajendra P Maurya
    Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.2024; 10(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
    Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of external accreditation on students’ performance: Insights from a full accreditation cycle
    Shuliweeh Alenezi, Ayman Al-Eadhy, Rana Barasain, Trad S. AlWakeel, Abdullah AlEidan, Hadeel N. Abohumid
    Heliyon.2023; 9(5): e15815.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the degree of social accountability in accreditation standards for basic medical education
    Sangmi T Lee, Eunbae B. Yang
    Korean Medical Education Review.2023; 25(3): 273.     CrossRef
  • Seal of Approval or Ticket to Triumph? The Impact of Accreditation on Medical Student Performance in Foreign Medical Council Examinations
    Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih, Kresna Lintang Pratidina
    Indian Journal of Medical Specialities.2023; 14(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Public availability of information from officially accredited medical schools in China
    Shaowen Li, Kun Su, Peiwen Li, Yifei Sun, Ying Pan, Weimin Wang, Huixian Cui
    BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Research Trends in the Korean Journal of Medical Education and Korean Medical Education Review Using Keyword Network Analysis
    Aehwa Lee, Soon Gu Kim, Ilseon Hwang
    Korean Medical Education Review.2021; 23(3): 176.     CrossRef
  • Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33.     CrossRef
History of the medical education accreditation system in Korea: implementation and activities in the early stages  
Kwang-ho Meng
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:29.   Published online October 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.29
  • 4,838 View
  • 96 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Following the opening of 12 new medical schools in Korea in the 1980s, standardization and accreditation of medical schools came to the forefront in the early 1990s. To address the medical community’s concerns about the quality of medical education, the Korean Council for University Education and Ministry of Education conducted a compulsory medical school evaluation in 1996 to see whether medical schools were meeting academic standards or not. This evaluation was, however, a norm-referenced assessment, rather than a criterion-referenced assessment. As a result, the Accreditation Board for Medical Education in Korea (ABMEK) was founded in 1998 as a voluntary organization by the medical community. With full support of the Korean medical community, ABMEK completed its 1st cycle of evaluations of all 41 medical schools from 2000 to 2004. In 2004, ABMEK changed its name to the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) as a corporate body. After that, the Korean government paid closer attention to its voluntary accreditation activities. In 2014, the Ministry of Education officially recognized the KIMEE as the 1st professional institute for higher education evaluation accreditation. The most important lesson learned from ABMEK/KIMEE is the importance of collaboration among all medical education-related organizations, including the Korean Medical Association.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and psychometric evaluation of the nursing home accreditation scale: A methodological study
    Ali Jadidi, Banafshe Samari, Ali Faal Araghi Nejad, Leili Tapak, Masoud Khodaveisi
    International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.2024; 20: 100643.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
    Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Needs Assessment for the Development of Training Curricula for Internal Medicine Residents
    Kwi Hwa Park, Seung-Joo Na, Youngjon Kim, Sun Jung Myung, Ju Hee Lee, Sun Woo Lee, Bo Young Yoon
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Special reviews on the history and future of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation to memorialize its collaboration with the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute to designate JEEHP as a co-official journal
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 33.     CrossRef
Research article
Similarity of the cut score in test sets with different item amounts using the modified Angoff, modified Ebel, and Hofstee standard-setting methods for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination  
Janghee Park, Mi Kyoung Yim, Na Jin Kim, Duck Sun Ahn, Young-Min Kim
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:28.   Published online October 5, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.28
  • 6,110 View
  • 188 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The Korea Medical Licensing Exam (KMLE) typically contains a large number of items. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in the cut score between evaluating all items of the exam and evaluating only some items when conducting standard-setting.
Methods
We divided the item sets that appeared on 3 recent KMLEs for the past 3 years into 4 subsets of each year of 25% each based on their item content categories, discrimination index, and difficulty index. The entire panel of 15 members assessed all the items (360 items, 100%) of the year 2017. In split-half set 1, each item set contained 184 (51%) items of year 2018 and each set from split-half set 2 contained 182 (51%) items of the year 2019 using the same method. We used the modified Angoff, modified Ebel, and Hofstee methods in the standard-setting process.
Results
Less than a 1% cut score difference was observed when the same method was used to stratify item subsets containing 25%, 51%, or 100% of the entire set. When rating fewer items, higher rater reliability was observed.
Conclusion
When the entire item set was divided into equivalent subsets, assessing the exam using a portion of the item set (90 out of 360 items) yielded similar cut scores to those derived using the entire item set. There was a higher correlation between panelists’ individual assessments and the overall assessments.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Application of computer-based testing in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination, the emergence of the metaverse in medical education, journal metrics and statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 2.     CrossRef
  • Possibility of using the yes/no Angoff method as a substitute for the percent Angoff method for estimating the cutoff score of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: a simulation study
    Janghee Park
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 23.     CrossRef
  • Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study
    Ying-Ying Yang, Pin-Hsiang Huang, Ling-Yu Yang, Chia-Chang Huang, Chih-Wei Liu, Shiau-Shian Huang, Chen-Huan Chen, Fa-Yauh Lee, Shou-Yen Kao, Boaz Shulruf
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 27.     CrossRef
  • Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study
    Do-Hwan Kim, Ye Ji Kang, Hoon-Ki Park
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 33.     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: Quarantine guidelines to protect examinees from coronavirus disease 2019, clinical skills examination for dental licensing, and computer-based testing for medical, dental, and oriental medicine licensing
    Yoon-Seong Lee
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 1.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea
    Song Yi Park, Sang-Hwa Lee, Min-Jeong Kim, Ki-Hwan Ji, Ji Ho Ryu
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 25.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions