Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Seung-Jae Hong 1 Article
Changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019  
Hyo Hyun Yoo, Mi Kyung Kim, Yoo Sang Yoon, Keun Mi Lee, Jong Hun Lee, Seung-Jae Hong, Jung –Sik Huh, Won Kyun Park
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:2.   Published online April 7, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.2
  • 7,485 View
  • 200 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
This review presents information on changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools in Korea by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) from 2000 to 2019. Specifically, the following aspects are explained: the development process, setting principles and directions, evaluation items, characteristics of the standards, and validity testing over the course of 4 cycles. The first cycle of accreditation (2000–2005) focused on ensuring the minimum requirements for the educational environment. The evaluation criteria emphasized the core elements of medical education, including facilities and human resources. The second cycle of accreditation (2007–2010) emphasized universities’ commitment to social accountability and the pursuit of excellence in medical education. It raised the importance of qualitative standards for judging the content and quality of education. In the post-second accreditation cycle (2012–2018) which means third accreditation cycle, accreditation criteria were developed to standardize the educational environment and programs and to be used for curriculum development in order to continually improve the quality of basic medical education. Most recently, the ASK 2019 (Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019) accreditation cycle focused on qualitative evaluations in accordance with the World Federation of Medical Education’s accreditation criteria to reach the international level of basic medical education, which emphasizes the need for a student-centered curriculum, communication with society, and evaluation through a comprehensive basic medical education course. The KIMEE has developed a basic medical education evaluation and accreditation system in a step-by-step manner, as outlined above. Understanding previous processes will be helpful for the future development of accreditation criteria for medical schools in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study
    Yoonjung Lee, Min-jung Lee, Junmoo Ahn, Chungwon Ha, Ye Ji Kang, Cheol Woong Jung, Dong-Mi Yoo, Jihye Yu, Seung-Hee Lee
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 8.     CrossRef
  • Quality and constructed knowledge: Truth, paradigms, and the state of the science
    Janet Grant, Leonard Grant
    Medical Education.2023; 57(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Current perception of social accountability of medical schools in Japan: A qualitative content analysis
    Hiroko Mori, Masashi Izumiya, Mikio Hayashi, Masato Eto
    Medical Teacher.2023; 45(5): 524.     CrossRef
  • Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation
    Kwi Hwa Park, Geon Ho Lee, Su Jin Chae, Seong Yong Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2023; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of external accreditation on students’ performance: Insights from a full accreditation cycle
    Shuliweeh Alenezi, Ayman Al-Eadhy, Rana Barasain, Trad S. AlWakeel, Abdullah AlEidan, Hadeel N. Abohumid
    Heliyon.2023; 9(5): e15815.     CrossRef
  • Is West Really Best? The Discourse of Modernisation in Global Medical School Regulation Policy
    Mohammed Ahmed Rashid, Ann Griffin
    Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2023; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the degree of social accountability in accreditation standards for basic medical education
    Sangmi T Lee, Eunbae B. Yang
    Korean Medical Education Review.2023; 25(3): 273.     CrossRef
  • Quality improvement in allied healthcare: Key recommendations for educational institutions
    Jithin Kalathikudiyil Sreedharan, Saad Mohammed AlRabeeah, Arun Vijay Subbarayalu, Edan M. AlZahrani, Jaber Saud AlQahtani, Mohammed Dafer AlAhmari, Abdullah Saeed AlQahtani, Musallam AlNasser, Amal AlSomali, Asma Falah AlHarbi, Yaser AlNaam, Ibrahim A. A
    Informatics in Medicine Unlocked.2023; 43: 101412.     CrossRef
  • Development of consensus-based aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods for a history of medicine and pharmacy course for medical and pharmacy students in the Arab world: a Delphi study
    Ramzi Shawahna
    BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of external academic accreditation of undergraduate medical program on students’ satisfaction
    Ayman Al-Eyadhy, Shuliweeh Alenezi
    BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Why social accountability of medical schools in Sudan can lead to better primary healthcare and excellence in medical education?
    MohamedH Ahmed, MohamedElhassan Abdalla, MohamedH Taha
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2020; 9(8): 3820.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions