-
Improved quality and quantity of written feedback is associated with a structured feedback proforma
-
Philip M. Newton, Melisa J. Wallace, Judy McKimm
-
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2012;9:10. Published online August 13, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2012.9.10
-
-
54,780
View
-
212
Download
-
19
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Facilitating the provision of detailed, deep and useful feedback is an important design feature of any educational programme. Here we evaluate feedback provided to medical students completing short transferable skills projects. Feedback quantity and depth were evaluated before and after a simple intervention to change the structure of the feedback-provision form from a blank free-text feedback form to a structured proforma that asked a pair of short questions for each of the six domains being assessed. Each pair of questions consisted of asking the marker ?占퐓hat was done well???and ?占퐓hat changes would improve the assignment???Changing the form was associated with a significant increase in the quantity of the feedback and in the amount and quality of feedback provided to students. We also observed that, for these double-marked projects, the marker designated as ?占퐉arker 1??consistently wrote more feedback than the marker designated ?占퐉arker 2??
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback
Marloes Nederhand, Bas Giesbers, Judith Auer, Ad Scheepers Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2024; 49(3): 288. CrossRef - Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback
Richard Harris, Pam Blundell-Birtill, Madeleine Pownall Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2023; 48(5): 672. CrossRef - How an EPA-based curriculum supports professional identity formation
Anne E. Bremer, Marjolein H. J. van de Pol, Roland F. J. M. Laan, Cornelia R. M. G. Fluit BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Narrative Assessments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review to Identify Evidence-Based Quality Indicators
Molk Chakroun, Vincent R. Dion, Kathleen Ouellet, Ann Graillon, Valérie Désilets, Marianne Xhignesse, Christina St-Onge Academic Medicine.2022; 97(11): 1699. CrossRef - Teaching in Geriatrics: The Potential of a Structured Written Feedback for the Improvement of Lectures
Theresa Pohlmann, Volker Paulmann, Sandra Steffens, Klaus Hager European Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology.2022; 4(3): 123. CrossRef - Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality
J.G. Arts, M. Jaspers, D. Joosten-ten Brinke, Sammy King Fai Hui Cogent Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Implementation of written structured feedback into a surgical OSCE
J. Sterz, S. Linßen, M. C. Stefanescu, T. Schreckenbach, L. B. Seifert, M. Ruesseler BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Eliciting student feedback for course development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students
Carly Steyn, Clint Davies, Adeel Sambo Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2019; 44(1): 11. CrossRef - Diş Hekimliği Eğitiminde Beceri ve Yeterliğin Değerlendirilmesi II: Değerlendirme Yöntemleri
Kadriye Funda AKALTAN Selcuk Dental Journal.2019; 6(5): 72. CrossRef - Effect of individual structured and qualified feedback on improving clinical performance of dental students in clinical courses‐randomised controlled study
I. M. Schüler, R. Heinrich‐Weltzien, M. Eiselt European Journal of Dental Education.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - The Effect of High-Frequency, Structured Expert Feedback on the Learning Curves of Basic Interventional Ultrasound Skills Applied to Regional Anesthesia
Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho, Francisco de Assis Caire Mettrau Anesthesia & Analgesia.2018; 126(3): 1028. CrossRef - A case study on written comments as a form of feedback in teacher education: so much to gain
Jorik Gerardus Arts, Mieke Jaspers, Desiree Joosten-ten Brinke European Journal of Teacher Education.2016; 39(2): 159. CrossRef - Medical students’ satisfaction with the Applied Basic Clinical Seminar with Scenarios for Students, a novel simulation-based learning method in Greece
Panteleimon Pantelidis, Nikolaos Staikoglou, Georgios Paparoidamis, Christos Drosos, Stefanos Karamaroudis, Athina Samara, Christodoulos Keskinis, Michail Sideris, George Giannakoulas, Georgios Tsoulfas, Asterios Karagiannis Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 13. CrossRef - The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study
Jasmina Sterz, Sebastian H. Höfer, Bernd Bender, Maren Janko, Farzin Adili, Miriam Ruesseler BMC Medical Education.2016;[Epub] CrossRef - Group Peer Teaching: A Strategy for Building Confidence in Communication and Teamwork Skills in Physical Therapy Students
Christopher Seenan, Sivaramkumar Shanmugam, Jennie Stewart Journal of Physical Therapy Education.2016; 30(3): 40. CrossRef - Does Reflective Learning with Feedback Improve Dental Students’ Self‐Perceived Competence in Clinical Preparedness?
Jung-Joon Ihm, Deog-Gyu Seo Journal of Dental Education.2016; 80(2): 173. CrossRef - Encouraging formative assessments of leadership for foundation doctors
Lindsay Hadley, David Black, Jan Welch, Peter Reynolds, Clare Penlington The Clinical Teacher.2015; 12(4): 231. CrossRef - Use of the ‘Stop, Start, Continue’ method is associated with the production of constructive qualitative feedback by students in higher education
Alice Hoon, Emily Oliver, Kasia Szpakowska, Philip Newton Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.2015; 40(5): 755. CrossRef - The New Era of : What Should Be Prepared to Be a Top Journal in the Category of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Sun Huh Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2013; 19(4): 419. CrossRef
|