-
Performance of the Ebel standard-setting method for the spring 2019 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada internal medicine certification examination consisting of multiple-choice questions
-
Jimmy Bourque, Haley Skinner, Jonathan Dupré, Maria Bacchus, Martha Ainslie, Irene W. Y. Ma, Gary Cole
-
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:12. Published online April 20, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.12
-
-
7,029
View
-
175
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Purpose
This study aimed to assess the performance of the Ebel standard-setting method for the spring 2019 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada internal medicine certification examination consisting of multiple-choice questions. Specifically, the following parameters were evaluated: inter-rater agreement, the correlations between Ebel scores and item facility indices, the impact of raters’ knowledge of correct answers on the Ebel score, and the effects of raters’ specialty on inter-rater agreement and Ebel scores.
Methods Data were drawn from a Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification exam. The Ebel method was applied to 203 multiple-choice questions by 49 raters. Facility indices came from 194 candidates. We computed the Fleiss kappa and the Pearson correlations between Ebel scores and item facility indices. We investigated differences in the Ebel score according to whether correct answers were provided or not and differences between internists and other specialists using the t-test.
Results The Fleiss kappa was below 0.15 for both facility and relevance. The correlation between Ebel scores and facility indices was low when correct answers were provided and negligible when they were not. The Ebel score was the same whether the correct answers were provided or not. Inter-rater agreement and Ebel scores were not significantly different between internists and other specialists.
Conclusion Inter-rater agreement and correlations between item Ebel scores and facility indices were consistently low; furthermore, raters’ knowledge of the correct answers and raters’ specialty had no effect on Ebel scores in the present setting.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Competency Standard Derivation for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Image Interpretation for Emergency Physicians
Maya Harel-Sterling, Charisse Kwan, Jonathan Pirie, Mark Tessaro, Dennis D. Cho, Ailish Coblentz, Mohamad Halabi, Eyal Cohen, Lynne E. Nield, Martin Pusic, Kathy Boutis Annals of Emergency Medicine.2023; 81(4): 413. CrossRef - The effects of a land-based home exercise program on surfing performance in recreational surfers
Jerry-Thomas Monaco, Richard Boergers, Thomas Cappaert, Michael Miller, Jennifer Nelson, Meghan Schoenberger Journal of Sports Sciences.2023; 41(4): 358. CrossRef - Medical specialty certification exams studied according to the Ottawa Quality Criteria: a systematic review
Daniel Staudenmann, Noemi Waldner, Andrea Lörwald, Sören Huwendiek BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - A Target Population Derived Method for Developing a Competency Standard in Radiograph Interpretation
Michelle S. Lee, Martin V. Pusic, Mark Camp, Jennifer Stimec, Andrew Dixon, Benoit Carrière, Joshua E. Herman, Kathy Boutis Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2022; 34(2): 167. CrossRef - Pediatric Musculoskeletal Radiographs: Anatomy and Fractures Prone to Diagnostic Error Among Emergency Physicians
Winny Li, Jennifer Stimec, Mark Camp, Martin Pusic, Joshua Herman, Kathy Boutis The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2022; 62(4): 524. CrossRef - Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study
Do-Hwan Kim, Ye Ji Kang, Hoon-Ki Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 33. CrossRef - Image interpretation: Learning analytics–informed education opportunities
Elana Thau, Manuela Perez, Martin V. Pusic, Martin Pecaric, David Rizzuti, Kathy Boutis AEM Education and Training.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
|