Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Fahad Alam 1 Article
A cost-effectiveness analysis of self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises in perioperative medicine in Canada  
Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Fahad Alam, Jeffrey Hoch, Sylvain Boet
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:44.   Published online December 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.44
  • 25,964 View
  • 288 Download
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
High-fidelity simulation training is effective for learning crisis resource management (CRM) skills, but cost is a major barrier to implementing high-fidelity simulation training into the curriculum. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of self-debriefing and traditional instructor debriefing in CRM training programs and to calculate the minimum willingness-to-pay (WTP) value when one debriefing type becomes more cost-effective than the other. Methods: This study used previous data from a randomized controlled trial involving 50 anesthesiology residents in Canada. Each participant managed a pretest crisis scenario. Participants who were randomized to self-debrief used the video of their pretest scenario with no instructor present during their debriefing. Participants from the control group were debriefed by a trained instructor using the video of their pretest scenario. Participants individually managed a post-test simulated crisis scenario. We compared the cost and effectiveness of self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing using net benefit regression. The cost-effectiveness estimate was reported as the incremental net benefit and the uncertainty was presented using a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Results: Self-debriefing costs less than instructor debriefing. As the WTP increased, the probability that self-debriefing would be cost-effective decreased. With a WTP ≤Can$200, the self-debriefing program was cost-effective. However, when effectiveness was priced higher than cost-savings and with a WTP >Can$300, instructor debriefing was the preferred alternative. Conclusion: With a lower WTP (≤Can$200), self-debriefing was cost-effective in CRM simulation training when compared to instructor debriefing. This study provides evidence regarding cost-effectiveness that will inform decision-makers and clinical educators in their decision-making process, and may help to optimize resource allocation in education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Empirical Support for Establishing Common Assumptions in Cost Research in Education
    Robert Shand, A. Brooks Bowden
    Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.2022; 15(1): 103.     CrossRef
  • Co-ordinated multidisciplinary intervention to reduce time to successful extubation for children on mechanical ventilation: the SANDWICH cluster stepped-wedge RCT
    Bronagh Blackwood, Kevin P Morris, Joanne Jordan, Lisa McIlmurray, Ashley Agus, Roisin Boyle, Mike Clarke, Christina Easter, Richard G Feltbower, Karla Hemming, Duncan Macrae, Clíona McDowell, Margaret Murray, Roger Parslow, Mark J Peters, Glenn Phair, Ly
    Health Technology Assessment.2022; 26(18): 1.     CrossRef
  • Is it valid to assess an individual’s performance in team training simulation when the supporting team are confederates? A controlled and randomized clinical trial
    Jérémie Traoré, Frédéric Balen, Thomas Geeraerts, Sandrine Charpentier, Xavier Dubucs, Charles-Henri Houzé-Cerfon
    BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-technical skills for urological surgeons (NoTSUS): development and evaluation of curriculum and assessment scale
    Abdullatif Aydın, Cora M. Griffin, Oliver Brunckhorst, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Nicholas Raison, Haleema Aya, Craig McIlhenny, James Brewin, Majid Shabbir, Joan Palou Redorta, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed
    World Journal of Urology.2021; 39(6): 2231.     CrossRef
  • Instructor-led oral debriefing technique in clinical nursing simulation: integrative review
    Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento, Fabiana Cristina Pires, João Pedro Resende Castro, Kleiton Gonçalves do Nascimento, Jordana Luiza Gouvêa de Oliveira, Maria Celia Barcellos Dalri
    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
    Cora Griffin, Abdullatif Aydın, Oliver Brunckhorst, Nicholas Raison, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed
    World Journal of Urology.2020; 38(7): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Effects of peer-led debriefing using simulation with case-based learning: Written vs. observed debriefing
    Eun-Ho Ha
    Nurse Education Today.2020; 84: 104249.     CrossRef
  • A targeted systematic review of cost analyses for implementation of simulation-based education in healthcare
    Daniel S Hippe, Rachel A Umoren, Alex McGee, Sherri L Bucher, Brian W Bresnahan
    SAGE Open Medicine.2020; 8: 205031212091345.     CrossRef
  • Medical Doctors’ Offline Computer-Assisted Digital Education: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration
    Hayfaa Abdelmageed Wahabi, Samia Ahmed Esmaeil, Khawater Hassan Bahkali, Maher Abdelraheim Titi, Yasser Sami Amer, Amel Ahmed Fayed, Amr Jamal, Nasriah Zakaria, Amna Rehana Siddiqui, Monika Semwal, Lorainne Tudor Car, Paul Posadzki, Josip Car
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2019; 21(3): e12998.     CrossRef
  • Peer-Led Written Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Oral Debriefing: Using Multimode Simulation
    Eun-Ho Ha, Eun Ju Lim
    Clinical Simulation in Nursing.2018; 18: 38.     CrossRef
  • Instructor-led vs. peer-led debriefing in preoperative care simulation using standardized patients
    Sang Suk Kim, Jennie C. De Gagne
    Nurse Education Today.2018; 71: 34.     CrossRef
  • What is interesting in the issue 2016 of Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions?
    Yera Hur
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 46.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions