Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Constantin Ehrengut 1 Article
GPT-4o’s competency in answering the simulated written European Board of Interventional Radiology exam compared to a medical student and experts in Germany and its ability to generate exam items on interventional radiology: a descriptive study
Sebastian Ebel, Constantin Ehrengut, Timm Denecke, Holger Gößmann, Anne Bettina Beeskow
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:21.   Published online August 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.21
  • 611 View
  • 262 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to determine whether ChatGPT-4o, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) platform, was able to pass a simulated written European Board of Interventional Radiology (EBIR) exam and whether GPT-4o can be used to train medical students and interventional radiologists of different levels of expertise by generating exam items on interventional radiology.
Methods
GPT-4o was asked to answer 370 simulated exam items of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE) for EBIR preparation (CIRSE Prep). Subsequently, GPT-4o was requested to generate exam items on interventional radiology topics at levels of difficulty suitable for medical students and the EBIR exam. Those generated items were answered by 4 participants, including a medical student, a resident, a consultant, and an EBIR holder. The correctly answered items were counted. One investigator checked the answers and items generated by GPT-4o for correctness and relevance. This work was done from April to July 2024.
Results
GPT-4o correctly answered 248 of the 370 CIRSE Prep items (67.0%). For 50 CIRSE Prep items, the medical student answered 46.0%, the resident 42.0%, the consultant 50.0%, and the EBIR holder 74.0% correctly. All participants answered 82.0% to 92.0% of the 50 GPT-4o generated items at the student level correctly. For the 50 GPT-4o items at the EBIR level, the medical student answered 32.0%, the resident 44.0%, the consultant 48.0%, and the EBIR holder 66.0% correctly. All participants could pass the GPT-4o-generated items for the student level; while the EBIR holder could pass the GPT-4o-generated items for the EBIR level. Two items (0.3%) out of 150 generated by the GPT-4o were assessed as implausible.
Conclusion
GPT-4o could pass the simulated written EBIR exam and create exam items of varying difficulty to train medical students and interventional radiologists.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • From GPT-3.5 to GPT-4.o: A Leap in AI’s Medical Exam Performance
    Markus Kipp
    Information.2024; 15(9): 543.     CrossRef
  • Performance of ChatGPT and Bard on the medical licensing examinations varies across different cultures: a comparison study
    Yikai Chen, Xiujie Huang, Fangjie Yang, Haiming Lin, Haoyu Lin, Zhuoqun Zheng, Qifeng Liang, Jinhai Zhang, Xinxin Li
    BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
TOP