Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Christi Barbee 1 Article
Evaluation of student perceptions with 2 interprofessional assessment tools—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale—following didactic and clinical learning experiences in the United States  
Vincent Dennis, Melissa Craft, Dale Bratzler, Melody Yozzo, Denise Bender, Christi Barbee, Stephen Neely, Margaret Robinson
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:35.   Published online November 5, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.35
  • 10,791 View
  • 231 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts.
Methods
Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year. Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart, while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly. For the baseline and post-cohort assessments, 865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS. The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the baseline and post-cohort assessments. Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores. For each score, 3 comparisons were made simultaneously: overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort, overall baseline versus post-clinical cohort, and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort. Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons.
Results
The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS, respectively. The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores. No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score.
Conclusion
The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Interprofessional communication skills training to improve medical students’ and nursing trainees’ error communication - quasi-experimental pilot study
    Lina Heier, Barbara Schellenberger, Anna Schippers, Sebastian Nies, Franziska Geiser, Nicole Ernstmann
    BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tools for self- or peer-assessment of interprofessional competencies of healthcare students: a scoping review
    Sharon Brownie, Jia Rong Yap, Denise Blanchard, Issac Amankwaa, Amy Pearce, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Ann-Rong Yan, Patrea Andersen, Patrick Broman
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and implementation of interprofessional education activity among health professions students in Jordan: A pilot investigation
    Osama Y. Alshogran, Zaid Al-Hamdan, Alla El-Awaisi, Hana Alkhalidy, Nesreen Saadeh, Hadeel Alsqaier
    Journal of Interprofessional Care.2023; 37(4): 588.     CrossRef
  • Tools for faculty assessment of interdisciplinary competencies of healthcare students: an integrative review
    Sharon Brownie, Denise Blanchard, Isaac Amankwaa, Patrick Broman, Marrin Haggie, Carlee Logan, Amy Pearce, Kesava Sampath, Ann-Rong Yan, Patrea Andersen
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interprofessional education tracks: One schools response to common IPE barriers
    Kim G. Adcock, Sally Earl
    Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.2023; 15(5): 528.     CrossRef
  • Interprofessional education and collaborative practice in Nigeria – Pharmacists' and pharmacy students' attitudes and perceptions of the obstacles and recommendations
    Segun J. Showande, Tolulope P. Ibirongbe
    Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.2023; 15(9): 787.     CrossRef
  • To IPAS or not to IPAS? Examining the construct validity of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale in Hong Kong
    Fraide A. Ganotice, Amy Yin Man Chow, Kelvin Kai Hin Fan, Ui Soon Khoo, May Pui San Lam, Rebecca Po Wah Poon, Francis Hang Sang Tsoi, Michael Ning Wang, George L. Tipoe
    Journal of Interprofessional Care.2022; 36(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Turkish adaptation of the interprofessional attitude scale (IPAS)
    Mukadder Inci Baser Kolcu, Ozlem Surel Karabilgin Ozturkcu, Giray Kolcu
    Journal of Interprofessional Care.2022; 36(5): 684.     CrossRef
  • Patient participation in interprofessional learning and collaboration with undergraduate health professional students in clinical placements: A scoping review
    Catrine Buck Jensen, Bente Norbye, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren, Anita Iversen
    Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice.2022; 27: 100494.     CrossRef
  • Can interprofessional education change students’ attitudes? A case study from Lebanon
    Carine J. Sakr, Lina Fakih, Jocelyn Dejong, Nuhad Yazbick-Dumit, Hussein Soueidan, Wiam Haidar, Elias Boufarhat, Imad Bou Akl
    BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
TOP