Satisfaction with SBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I was satisfied with using the tablet PC as the testing tool. |
2.92 ±1.24 |
19 |
20 |
30 |
29 |
10 |
2. There was no difficulty in carrying out the test according to the advice for test takers presented on the tablet PC. |
3.13 ±1.26 |
15 |
18 |
20 |
30 |
16 |
Convenience of SBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Function of the remaining testing time notification was more convenient than an announcement of the remaining testing time. |
3.35 ±1.26 |
11 |
19 |
20 |
37 |
21 |
4. The selection and correction function of the correct answer was convenient. |
3.80 ±1.00 |
3 |
10 |
19 |
50 |
26 |
5. It was convenient to see one item at a time on the screen. |
3.85 ±1.01 |
2 |
11 |
19 |
45 |
31 |
6. The function of identifying items that were not marked before submitting the answers was convenient. |
4.23 ±0.74 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
52 |
42 |
7. It was convenient to be able to see the previous items, the next items, and all items. |
3.97 ±0.86 |
2 |
4 |
17 |
57 |
28 |
8. It was convenient to be able to see the solved items, unsolved items, checked items, and the items noted for later review selectively |
3.91 ±1.03 |
3 |
9 |
17 |
45 |
34 |
9. It was convenient to have a 'check'function for later review. |
4.18±0.77 |
0 |
3 |
15 |
50 |
40 |
10. The'check wrong answers'function to check the wrong answer option was convenient. |
3.95 ±0.95 |
1 |
7 |
24 |
40 |
36 |
11.The font size was appropriate. |
3.85 ±0.96 |
4 |
6 |
16 |
58 |
24 |
12.The typeface was appropriate. |
3.93 ±0.85 |
3 |
2 |
19 |
60 |
24 |
13. The loading time was adequate before the start of video playback. |
3.25 ±0.94 |
5 |
12 |
55 |
26 |
11 |
14. It was convenient to use then functions of zoom in and zoom out when viewing an image and replaying a video file. |
2.83 ±1.29 |
22 |
22 |
27 |
26 |
11 |
15.The overall screen configuration was appropriate. |
3.58 ±0.91 |
4 |
6 |
34 |
51 |
13 |
Advantages of SBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison with paper-and-pencil testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. It was convenient to select the correct answer on the tablet PC screen rather than marking the optical mark reader answer |
3.85 ±1.03 |
5 |
6 |
18 |
50 |
29 |
17. The absence of separate answer-card marking was helpful in managing the testing time. |
3.89 ±1.06 |
5 |
6 |
19 |
44 |
34 |
18.The psychological burden (tension) decreased because there was no separate answer-card marking. |
3.75±1.16 |
7 |
10 |
17 |
43 |
31 |
19.The font size was large and clear, minimizing eye fatigue. |
3.35 ±1.08 |
9 |
10 |
36 |
40 |
13 |
20. It was good to be able to see materials such as photographs, sounds, and video clips. |
3.07 ±1.09 |
11 |
18 |
40 |
30 |
9 |
21.Tablet PC-based testing was more convenient than paper-and-pencil testing. |
3.21 ±1.25 |
14 |
18 |
21 |
41 |
14 |
22.The test taker's ability is assessed more accurately by tablet PC-based testing than by paper-and-pencil testing. |
2.91 ±1.09 |
16 |
16 |
43 |
28 |
5 |
Comparison with desktop-based testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.The touch-screen method was more convenient than the mouse-click method for selecting the correct answer. |
3.33 ±1.12 |
10 |
12 |
31 |
42 |
13 |
24. There was less eye strain in the case of the tablet PC than in the case of the desktop PC monitor. |
3.22 ±1.09 |
9 |
14 |
42 |
30 |
13 |
25. There may be a decrease in cheating behavior during tablet PC-based testing as compared to desktop PC-based testing. |
3.24 ±1.03 |
9 |
10 |
45 |
34 |
10 |
26. The testing instrument was smart, and it helped me to focus more on the test. |
2.94 ±1.14 |
16 |
15 |
46 |
21 |
10 |
27. There was no noise or heat from the desktop computer, so the examination environment was comfortable. |
3.34 ±1.02 |
8 |
11 |
34 |
46 |
9 |
28. Tablet PC-based testing is an improved testing method compared to the existing desktop PC-based testing method. |
3.12 ±1.09 |
10 |
18 |
39 |
31 |
10 |