INTRODUCTION

Senior residents are entrusted with the responsibility of 80% of teaching of interns, medical students as well as patients regardless of their future career plans [1]. Nearly two-thirds of residents receive more than 40% of their education from other fellow residents [2]. Studies also show that residents conduct more teaching at the bedside compared to attending [3]. Despite their significant teaching responsibilities, they receive no formal instruction on how to teach effectively. Resident-as-teacher courses are flourishing in Western medical schools however there is a paucity of published information from Asian and developing countries [4].

The Medical Council of India (MCI) has made it mandatory for Medical Education Units (MEU) in India to conduct basic workshops on medical education technologies for younger faculty [5]. The actual implementation is however sporadic. The objective of the current report is to describe the MEU, University College of Medical Sciences (UCMS), Delhi’s initiative to propose a resident-as-educator program as a first step in a strategy to develop educational intervention for residents’ teaching skills. The secondary objective was to complement MEU’s mandate of training younger faculty by sensitizing residents who are going to be the future faculty members.

METHODS

Study setting

The MEU is the educational entity that conducts programs for undergraduate, postgraduate, residents and faculty members at UCMS [6]. A three day orientation course (workshop) for senior residents was designed by MEU, UCMS and was named Senior Resident Training on Educational Principles (STEP). The objectives of STEP was to provide the residents a repertoire of pedagogical practices from which to plan, implement and evaluate their own teaching to engage students in the learning process, to demonstrate competence and skill in understanding and using a range of assessment methods, to give feedback in an appropriate manner and to employ goal-seeking behavior and team-work in medical education, and as life skills.

Study design

The assessment needs of participants were performed by verbal feedback from focus groups and performance review. Program director (coordinator of medical education unit) and program coordinator (author) led the dual moderator focus group. Verbal feedbacks were recorded by later and transformed into written statements by frequent group meetings while preparation of the blueprint. A questionnaire survey is a better tool for performing needs assessment and we consider its lack as our limitation. The principles of adult learning were followed and voluntary residents were asked to register online. To facilitate better group interaction only twenty participants on first-cum-first basis were registered for STEP. The participants were residents from physiology, biochemistry, pediatrics, surgery, pharmacology, pathology, dermatology, forensic medicine, anesthesiology and ophthalmology. The course content and methodology adopted for STEP is given in Table 1. The three day course content was largely modified as per rankings given to themes to be used in a resident-as-teacher educational intervention having largest sample size reported till date [4].

Transfer of training model was deliberately employed to give chance to the earlier trained faculty at our institute to empower their skills in conjunction with experienced MEU core members to create a receptive environment for learning and evolving [7, 8].

Pre and post tests are at best a measure of short term memory. More often than not they assess factual knowledge change and as such were not used in STEP. Rather than focusing on output, stress was given on outcome and the only evaluation instrument collected at the end of the workshop was written program feedback.

RESULTS

Senior resident’s self-assessment in the form of program feedback is depicted in Table 2 and the pedagogical skills residents wish to implement after this intervention is shown in Fig. 1. Residents reported positive changes and self-confidence in attitude towards teaching. They predominantly wish to apply the skills of blueprinting, feedback, effective powerpoint and use of evaluation tools more than the other strategies.

DISCUSSION

Residents are frequently identified by medical students as their most frequent and memorable teachers [9]; They spend more time in direct contact with the health care institutions in-training personnel than many specialists or attending physicians, “and they influence greatly the hidden curriculum of the educational activities in daily clinical care” [4]. Despite influencing the majority of the unstructured ‘informal curriculum’ many of them teaches ineffectively [10–12]. There is no educational program tailored to their need to teach them pedagogical practices. Therefore it is indeed pertinent to optimize the teaching skills of residents and provide them with formal teacher training.

The philosophy behind our faculty development is exactly the same as that of pedagogical active learning strategy that students “learn best by doing, not by watching or listening” [13]. The same holds true for andragogy. We empowered our trained faculty members from previous workshop to act as facilitators to sensitize residents. Repeating this educational intervention will help MEU UCMS in identifying new facilitators from the resident group, a factor which will contribute to resolving the acute shortage of medical educationists. A study from Pakistan found residents to be an effective supplement to faculty members for facilitation of problem-based learning sessions [14].

In India, our residents are a breed of passionate fliers without adequate wings. The current report is the result of a first program for residents at our institute. The pedagogic effectiveness of STEP was attributed to a resident-centered, learning format with small group sessions. The participants liked non-competitive interactions among junior faculty members and appreciated participation of MEU faculty in a non-dominant role. Our findings are similar to other authors with a preference for interactive small group sessions with facilitators [4, 14–19]. Further researches are advocated so that medical schools are inclined to move from opinion-based tradition to evidence-based education.

Limitations

We did not used pre- and post-intervention outcome comparison method which may be considered by some as a limitation, as it only evaluates short-term memory. Sampling included residents from our own institute but as we are not aware of any other published work from India so it should be considered as an encouraging beginning with much scope for flexibility. Although resident self-confidence is important, self-assessment may not represent actual skills obtained and we consider it as a limitation.

Future directions

The literature suggests that lasting effects of interventions to improve teaching are associated with opportunities for follow-up in the teacher’s own setting [20]. To address this need, the approaches proposed are to assign each resident a teaching mentor [9] and to assign them as facilitators in next resident workshop.

Conclusions

Senior residents in India are not given adequate training to choose appropriate methodology for their future career progression. However catching them young can give them a sound foundation for honing their skills as a future faculty. Pedagogical competence is unlikely to be achieved by a single course and the need for reiteration in the form of repeated practice, feedback and self-reflection is imperative. Research also is needed to assess the lasting effect of resident teaching courses and the impact of brief follow-up sessions to reinforce skills.

Acknowledgments

Article information

This article is available from: http://jeehp.org/

Fig. 1.

Pedagogical skills residents want to implement after the intervention.

STEP, Senior Resident Training on Educational Principles; MCQ, multiple-choice question; OSCE, objective structured clinical exams; OSLER, objective structured long examination record.

References

• 1. Edwards JC, Friedland JA, Bing-You R. Residents’ teaching skills. New York: Springer Publishing; 2002. PubMed
• 2. Brown RS. House staff attitudes toward teaching. J Med Educ 1970;45:156-9. ArticlePubMed
• 3. Tremonti LP, Biddle WB. Teaching behaviors of residents and faculty members. J Med Educ 1982;57:854-9. ArticlePubMed
• 4. Sanchez-Mendiola M, Graue-Wiechers EL, Ruiz-Perez LC, Garcia-Duran R, Durante-Montiel I. The resident-as-teacher educational challenge: a needs assessment survey at the National Autonomous University of Mexico Faculty of Medicine. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:17.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 5. Srinivas DK, Adkoli BV. Faculty development in medical education in India: the need of the day. Al Ameen J Med Sci 2009;2:6-13.
• 6. University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi [Internet]New Delhi [cited 2010 Oct 3]. Available from: http://medicaleducationunit.yolasite.com
• 7. Kraiger K, Ford JK, Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol 1993;78:311-28. Article
• 8. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
• 9. Mann KV, Sutton E, Frank B. Twelve tips for preparing residents as teachers. Med Teach 2007;29:301-6. ArticlePubMed
• 10. Morrison EH, Hafler JP. Yesterday a learner, today a teacher too: residents as teachers in 2000. Pediatrics 2000;105:238-41. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 11. Morrison EH, Hollingshead J, Hubbell FA, Hitchcock MA, Rucker L, Prislin MD. Reach out and teach someone: generalist residents’ needs for teaching skills development. Fam Med 2002;34:445-50. PubMed
• 12. Nkanginieme KE, Ihekwaba AE. Students’ perception of the house officer as a teacher. Med Teach 1998;20:109-13. Article
• 13. Singh S. Teaching the teachers: where next with faculty development? Al Ameen J Med Sci 2010;3:259-60.
• 14. Jafri W, Mumtaz K, Burdick WP, Morahan PS, Freeman R, Zehra T. Improving the teaching skills of residents as tutors/facilitators and addressing the shortage of faculty facilitators for PBL modules. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:34.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 15. Hill AG, Yu TC, Barrow M, Hattie J. A systematic review of resident-as-teacher programmes. Med Educ 2009;43:1129-40. ArticlePubMed
• 16. Gaba ND, Blatt B, Macri CJ, Greenberg L. Improving teaching skills in obstetrics and gynecology residents: evaluation of a residents-asteachers program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:87.e1-7. Article
• 17. Morrison EH, Rucker L, Boker JR, Gabbert CC, Hubbell FA, Hitchcock MA, et al. The effect of a 13-hour curriculum to improve residents’ teaching skills: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:257-63. ArticlePubMed
• 18. Snell L. Improving medical residents’ teaching skills. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 1989;22:125-8.
• 19. Hammoud MM, Haefner HK, Schigelone A, Gruppen LD. Teaching residents how to teach improves quality of clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1741-5. ArticlePubMed
• 20. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach 2006;28:497-526. ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Curso de docencia para residentes: evaluación de un programa
  Ana C. Olascoaga
  Educación Médica.2020; 21(3): 187.     CrossRef
• Developing Humanistic Competencies Within the Competency-Based Curriculum
  Satendra Singh, Upreet Dhaliwal, Navjeevan Singh
  Indian Pediatrics.2020; 57(11): 1060.     CrossRef
• Minor Gynecologic Surgery: A Review of the Training Experience and Skill Building Opportunities for Providers in Low and Middle Income Countries
  Rachel Marie Clark, Leslie Siriya Bradford, Jessica Opoku-Anane, Joseph Ngonzi, Ferdous Islam, Mithila Faruque, Annekathryn Goodman
  Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2014; 04(07): 432.     CrossRef