1Department of Education, Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
2Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
4Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
5UAB’s Institute for Arts in Medicine, Alys Stephens Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
© 2019, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The values in parenthesis are inter-rater reliability coefficients. The ICCs of inter-rater reliability between the HFMPES composite scores of the 2 raters for the 3 magic tricks were as follows: challenge knot trick, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67–0.85); linking paper clips trick, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65–0.85); and hopping rubber bands trick, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62–0.83). Using the ICC to compute the associations among the 3 HFMPES scores of the 2 raters for the 3 magic tricks produced the same coefficients in the correlation matrix as using the Pearson product moment correlation.
HFMPES, Hocus Focus Magic Performance Evaluation Scale; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficients; CI, confidence interval.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization: KS, HKY. Data curation: KS, MD. Formal analysis: HKY. Methodology: HKY, GJ. Project administration: KK, GJ. Visualization: MD, GJ, KK. Writing–original draft: HKY, KS, KK. Writing–review & editing: KS, HKY, GJ, KK.
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding
None.